[h2]With Stoudemire deal in limbo, Warriors still itching for a deal: How about Michael Beasley?[/h2]
Posted by
Tim Kawakami on June 28th, 2009 at 4:51 pm | Categorized as
NBA,
Warriors
I'm not saying the Miami Heat have put second-year forward Michael Beasley on the market. I'm not saying any talks of any kind have started up between the Warriors and Heat about anything.
I'm definitely not saying the Warriors are ready to start tossing names at Miami to see if the Heat will bite. This is a lull time. There's no great rush, with the draft completed.
What I'm saying: The hot-and-heavy discussions to send Amare Stoudemire to the Warriors for a package including Andris Biedrins, Brandan Wright and Marco Belinelli (and perhaps some guy named Stephen Curry, oops!) seem to be at a stymie point.
And, according to one high-placed league source, the Warriors sound like they're more than willing to bypass Phoenix and Stoudemire, if they need to, in order to try to fill the GSW's desire for a scoring big man.
It's not just Stoudemire or bust. There have always been other names on the Warriors' wish list, and there are other names now. If they can't get Stoudemire without Curry, Larry Riley, Don Nelson and Robert Rowell seem prepared to go in other directions.
The only certainty: They want a big man who can score, and are willing to give up two or three players to get him.
The other: They feel like they've got a lot of assets that are attractive to other teams.
Now, can the Warriors put those two things together and get the big man they believe is essential to springing the franchise towards a playoff berth?
Chris Bosh, obviously, might be the best fit for Don Nelson's offense, but there are major questions about his availability and his willingness to talk contract extension beyond his 2010 free agency.
There are other names. One I heard today: Beasley.
By the way, this doesn't mean the Stoudemire deal is dead. It can always be revived. They want him. The Suns want a lot of the things the Warriors have. It could still happen, with or without Curry.
Steve Kerr and Don Nelson came oh-so-close on draft night, and there's no reason they can't get things started again soon, after a cooling off period.
In fact, if the Warriors do jump into immediate and serious trade talks with other teams for a big man, and if the Suns start collecting other strong bids for Stoudemire, that might be the perfect way to get Kerr and Nelson back on track.
But let's take a closer look at Beasley… Could he be an answer for the Warriors?
He was the second pick overall in last year's draft (after Derrick Rose), and started only 19 games last year for Miami, playing way too recklessly to put alongside Dwyane Wade in the Heat starting line-up.
Basically, Beasley turned into Miami's second-unit microwave: When Wade came out, Beasley got to jack it up at will for limited minutes, sometimes effectively, sometimes not. The jury is out about his future as an NBA power/scorer starter.
Beasley, 20, is listed at 6-foot-10, same as he was in his one year at Kansas State, but 2008 pre-draft measurements had him closer to 6-8, and he certainly didn't play very big as an NBA rookie.
Beasley averaged 13.9 points and 5.4 rebounds, shooting 47.2% from the field (but a very good 40.7% from three-point and a very good 77.2% from FT line), and had 38 more turnovers than assists.
Nelson has to love the three-point and FT percentages, by the way.
Beasley's performance as Miami's sixth man in the Heat's seven-game loss to Atlanta in the playoffs was a perfect example:
* Went for 22 and 15 in the Heat's Game 6 victory to force Game 7, and was +16 in the plus/minus.
* Went for 17 and 11 (shooting 7 for 12 from the field) in the Heat's Game 7 loss, and was +10 in the plus/minus. (Wade was -20.)
* But he scored only 46 points combined in the first 5 games of the series, including a 2-point (0 for 3) clunker in Game 4, when he was -17 in a 10-point Miami loss.
One big advantage to Beasley over Stoudemire: Beasley is under team control for several more years, unlike Stoudemire (or Bosh), who can become a free agent after next season and would either be free to walk away if the Warriors traded for him or would demand a monster contract extension.
Beasley is certainly a talent. He can shoot. He might fit nicely around Monta Ellis, Stephen Jackson, Anthony Randolph and maybe Curry (though I'd think the Warriors would have to give up Curry and maybe even Randolph).
I'd figure Andris Biedrins stays in this scenario, but he's an either/or with Randolph if the Warriors get a shooting big man. You pair the shooting big man with either Biedrins or Randolph and trade the other. That's just a guess and it does seem to be the thinking of the proposed Stoudemire package.
Anyway, it doesn't look like Beasley plays much defense (just 37 blocks in the regular season) and his low-rebound totals are worrisome. But he's a name to remember.
Maybe Miami hears about this report and laughs. Maybe Miami is willing to talk about Beasley since Pat Riley hasn't seemed enamored of Beasley's head-down, no-pass, low-rebound game so far.
I'm sure there will be more name emanating from the Warriors' wish list. And I'm sure they'll be chasing 'em all until they get a big man who can score.