gllahone84
Banned
- 11,727
- 1,912
yeah funny how dude just created an account yesterday.
back to the post.
back to the post.
Delete
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by futurehendrix,
- Start date
jbuch2
Banned
- 803
- 68
I'm so concerned what some lames on the internet think about me. Right? LOL.
Get real dude.
Get real dude.
gllahone84
Banned
- 11,727
- 1,912
Why are you in here?
You're an agent.
You're an agent.
jbuch2
Banned
- 803
- 68
Oh my gosh hahahah
Im done with you dudes.
Ill stick to the boston explosions thread you stick to this one.
gllahone84
Banned
- 11,727
- 1,912
cointelpro
- 21,554
- 12,374
Where did I say that? Dude was just in here to belittle other people. I'm glad people are disproving theories, but making fun of and being sarcastic toward other people because they're expressing their curiosity isn't necessary. If that's what you want to do then keep that in the other Boston thread...
- 5,858
- 1,758
I don't think Anton's back. He probs got suspended for arguing with Ninja.
Internet persona conspiracies
Meth's alternate persona is sillyputty. He's a result of years of pent up rage at users on NT and other boards involved with this one. Eventually the pressure became too much and he needed an outlet. Thus, the putty was molded. He could finally lash out with verbiage he was used to, all the while tip toeing that line of within rule and against the ROC. The tone and authoritative speech are a perfect match. Analogies, strong counters to arguments.
Putty used memes and various pics/gifs for emphasis, with nearly flawless execution. Since his departure, Meth's tendency to "poke fun" at users has increased. I've seen him use images within his posts..
Now you tell me....... Who really runs this site?
Wow!
I used to think silly putty would never be banned. Dude used to go hard on gp
- 5,858
- 1,758
So most of these helicopters the police use when helping the patrol cars search for suspects are equipped with that infrared technology they used to find dude in the boat? If so then that thing can see into homes too, right?
If so then no wonder they have a high rate of catching folks,
If so then no wonder they have a high rate of catching folks,
- 88,746
- 47,955
foh with this BS
i just seen the first 5 pics and i'm disgusted by some people smh, 3 innocent people are dead, and ******* acting like this **** is fake
yup most conspiracy folks give no respect for the dead. then insulft you because you dont believe what they do.
thats what happens when you have no life and make stuff up just to try and blow peoples minds online
jbuch2
Banned
- 803
- 68
yup most conspiracy folks give no respect for the dead. then insulft you because you dont believe what they do.
thats what happens when you have no life and make stuff up just to try and blow peoples minds online
Quoted for the got damn truth.
Last edited:
gllahone84
Banned
- 11,727
- 1,912
I respect the dead. The families have my deepest sympathy.
But I still remain a critical observer of events. Regardless.
Again...you're acting like a agent trying to derail a conspiracy thread.
Please post in the official Boston thread because you bring nothing of substance when you post in here.
But I still remain a critical observer of events. Regardless.
Again...you're acting like a agent trying to derail a conspiracy thread.
Please post in the official Boston thread because you bring nothing of substance when you post in here.
Last edited:
- 2,442
- 1,641
Unanswered Questions:
1. a. Why did they switch vehicles from their Honda Civic?
b. Why did they not kill the victim of the car jacking? They apparently drove around with him in the vehicle for 30 minutes and then just dropped him off. They had just shot two other people prior to the car jacking, why did they leave this person alive?
c. With dash cams installed in most police vehicles, why is there no footage of the actual chase through the streets of Watertown? Where is the footage of them throwing "pipe bombs" out of the window?
d. There was apparently gunfire exchanged with the brothers and police when the older brother was shot and killed. Where are the weapons and bombs that they were using in that exchange? How was the one brother shot and killed and the other brother was able to drive away?
e. The younger brother managed to elude police and then ended up in a foot pursuit with them near the mall around 4am. After a short foot pursuit they called it off. How did he out run the barrage of law enforcement in his vehicle and then elude them and a canine unit on foot, to which they ended up calling off the search.
f. When did the younger brother get out of the car jacked vehicle and why was there no apprehension made then?
g. When they finally did arrest the surviving brother, where are the weapons he had in the exchange of gunfire from the boat?
2. Why is there a limited amount of photos of the actual bombing and injured victims surfacing on the internet. With today's technology and everyone having a camera in their phone, there is a surprisingly small amount of actual photographic evidence of the injured from the blast. The claim is 180 injured, yet through a simple google search there is a series of around ten different victim photos that are recycled or shown from a different angle.
1. a. Why did they switch vehicles from their Honda Civic?
b. Why did they not kill the victim of the car jacking? They apparently drove around with him in the vehicle for 30 minutes and then just dropped him off. They had just shot two other people prior to the car jacking, why did they leave this person alive?
c. With dash cams installed in most police vehicles, why is there no footage of the actual chase through the streets of Watertown? Where is the footage of them throwing "pipe bombs" out of the window?
d. There was apparently gunfire exchanged with the brothers and police when the older brother was shot and killed. Where are the weapons and bombs that they were using in that exchange? How was the one brother shot and killed and the other brother was able to drive away?
e. The younger brother managed to elude police and then ended up in a foot pursuit with them near the mall around 4am. After a short foot pursuit they called it off. How did he out run the barrage of law enforcement in his vehicle and then elude them and a canine unit on foot, to which they ended up calling off the search.
f. When did the younger brother get out of the car jacked vehicle and why was there no apprehension made then?
g. When they finally did arrest the surviving brother, where are the weapons he had in the exchange of gunfire from the boat?
2. Why is there a limited amount of photos of the actual bombing and injured victims surfacing on the internet. With today's technology and everyone having a camera in their phone, there is a surprisingly small amount of actual photographic evidence of the injured from the blast. The claim is 180 injured, yet through a simple google search there is a series of around ten different victim photos that are recycled or shown from a different angle.
- 20,587
- 10,596
Damn, talk about reachin'.
jbuch2
Banned
- 803
- 68
What substance do your posts bring again? Did you really just call me a secret agent? Lol
jbuch2
Banned
- 803
- 68
This is substance? What substances were you smoking when you came up with this garbage?
- 10,756
- 9,096
I thought intentionally trying derail a thread got u banned? Dude obviously wants no parts of an adult discussion on the events that took place get em out of here
D
Deleted member 38307
Guest
Now that, is substance
- 42,320
- 44,195
That was the point....
celticsfan9783
Banned
- 5,318
- 665
Right?
A lot of "why why whys" with no valid points. Acting like officials would release crucial evidence to the public less than one week after it's over in the most important post 9/11 investigation
- 6,574
- 888
Posting articles written by the worlds leading Islamologist who specializes in criticizing the war on terror and claims this is solid proof of anything. You guys gotta do better
D
Deleted member 38307
Guest
How is this reaching? The man is asking legitimate questions.
celticsfan9783
Banned
- 5,318
- 665
They are legit questions if you don't use common sense and/or take 15 seconds to think about them.
gllahone84
Banned
- 11,727
- 1,912
Did you read it?Posting articles written by the worlds leading Islamologist who specializes in criticizing the war on terror and claims this is solid proof of anything. You guys gotta do better
That's like me reading a CNN article as if it doesn't have any slant.
Be objectionable.
- 6,574
- 888
Yeah i read it. I chuckled at the part about skulls being bashed at the occupy movement.
I walked through the occupy movement smoking a blunt drinking absolut out of a red cup and my skull is in tact.
I dont know what REALLY happened last Monday. And neither does anyone else. Speculation coming from a guy with a clear agenda is not PROOF to me. I respect your guys rights to have these discussions and the ability to question our government is what makes America whAt it is (or whats its supposed to be). But its only been a week since the bombs popped. How can we expect to have all the answers?
I walked through the occupy movement smoking a blunt drinking absolut out of a red cup and my skull is in tact.
I dont know what REALLY happened last Monday. And neither does anyone else. Speculation coming from a guy with a clear agenda is not PROOF to me. I respect your guys rights to have these discussions and the ability to question our government is what makes America whAt it is (or whats its supposed to be). But its only been a week since the bombs popped. How can we expect to have all the answers?
- 6,574
- 888
FTR i think the two brothers are indeed guilty. Dudes mentions how the older bro stopped smoking and drinkimg so now hes labeled a terrorist, but doesnt mention that his favorite youtube videos were all terrorists videos . The comments on his blog " I dont have any American friends... I dont understand them" "will box for a passport" ... Older bro did not like the US and the younger bro followed suit.
