- 11,315
- 57
Originally Posted by G14
Originally Posted by KayCurrency
Now if he had called Bosh a "%%%$$+", then I would understand.......
......im just saying
heat going to the finals tho
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by G14
Originally Posted by KayCurrency
Now if he had called Bosh a "%%%$$+", then I would understand.......
......im just saying
heat going to the finals tho
Originally Posted by G14
Originally Posted by KayCurrency
Now if he had called Bosh a "%%%$$+", then I would understand.......
......im just saying
heat going to the finals tho
QFTOriginally Posted by Furrell
Homophobe. They use that word for everything SMH.
QFTOriginally Posted by Furrell
Homophobe. They use that word for everything SMH.
YALL GOT A GOOD RUN I GIVE YOU THATOriginally Posted by KayCurrency
Originally Posted by G14
Originally Posted by KayCurrency
Now if he had called Bosh a "%%%$$+", then I would understand.......
......im just saying
heat going to the finals tho
YALL GOT A GOOD RUN I GIVE YOU THATOriginally Posted by KayCurrency
Originally Posted by G14
Originally Posted by KayCurrency
Now if he had called Bosh a "%%%$$+", then I would understand.......
......im just saying
heat going to the finals tho
great points. i concur.Originally Posted by Big J 33
It doesn't matter if the ref is a homosexual or not, Kobe is using a gay slur in an insulting manner even if his definition is unrelated to sexual orientation.
Simply because many people say "gay" when they mean something is stupid or dumb, or call someone a fa* when they mean they're weak or an idiot still isn't appropriate because "you're defining the word differently" it's still putting down homosexuals and marginalizing them in a negative way by association. You can't make that kind of separation when using hate speech.
Also, it isn't as if EVERY single homosexual has protested or complained about this, it was one organization, Human Rights Campaign... not GLAAD or dozens of other groups, so far it's just one. It seems like people in this thread are overreacting as the supposed "overreacting" by one group
great points. i concur.Originally Posted by Big J 33
It doesn't matter if the ref is a homosexual or not, Kobe is using a gay slur in an insulting manner even if his definition is unrelated to sexual orientation.
Simply because many people say "gay" when they mean something is stupid or dumb, or call someone a fa* when they mean they're weak or an idiot still isn't appropriate because "you're defining the word differently" it's still putting down homosexuals and marginalizing them in a negative way by association. You can't make that kind of separation when using hate speech.
Also, it isn't as if EVERY single homosexual has protested or complained about this, it was one organization, Human Rights Campaign... not GLAAD or dozens of other groups, so far it's just one. It seems like people in this thread are overreacting as the supposed "overreacting" by one group
Originally Posted by Big J 33
It doesn't matter if the ref is a homosexual or not, Kobe is using a gay slur in an insulting manner even if his definition is unrelated to sexual orientation.
Simply because many people say "gay" when they mean something is stupid or dumb, or call someone a fa* when they mean they're weak or an idiot still isn't appropriate because "you're defining the word differently" it's still putting down homosexuals and marginalizing them in a negative way by association. You can't make that kind of separation when using hate speech.
Also, it isn't as if EVERY single homosexual has protested or complained about this, it was one organization, Human Rights Campaign... not GLAAD or dozens of other groups, so far it's just one. It seems like people in this thread are overreacting as the supposed "overreacting" by one group
Originally Posted by Big J 33
It doesn't matter if the ref is a homosexual or not, Kobe is using a gay slur in an insulting manner even if his definition is unrelated to sexual orientation.
Simply because many people say "gay" when they mean something is stupid or dumb, or call someone a fa* when they mean they're weak or an idiot still isn't appropriate because "you're defining the word differently" it's still putting down homosexuals and marginalizing them in a negative way by association. You can't make that kind of separation when using hate speech.
Also, it isn't as if EVERY single homosexual has protested or complained about this, it was one organization, Human Rights Campaign... not GLAAD or dozens of other groups, so far it's just one. It seems like people in this thread are overreacting as the supposed "overreacting" by one group
Originally Posted by ShaunHillFTW49
What if I said this thread is so teen with a cheesy mustache
Originally Posted by ShaunHillFTW49
What if I said this thread is so teen with a cheesy mustache
That's not true at all...Originally Posted by moneymike88
F----- is never used as a term of endearment between gays.Originally Posted by proper english
Originally Posted by Air ih Zona
I dislike the Lakers so i'm not even on dude's side, but it's just a god damn word. stop crying over it
N word.
..but yea, im sure its different, right?
That's not true at all...Originally Posted by moneymike88
F----- is never used as a term of endearment between gays.Originally Posted by proper english
Originally Posted by Air ih Zona
I dislike the Lakers so i'm not even on dude's side, but it's just a god damn word. stop crying over it
N word.
..but yea, im sure its different, right?