- Sep 10, 2011
- 27,788
- 12,457
The actual group name is indeed GUERILLA Unit.
As mentioned earlier...there may be something different going on with the clothing.
chinese bootlegs
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The actual group name is indeed GUERILLA Unit.
As mentioned earlier...there may be something different going on with the clothing.
like the g-g-g-gangsta boogie
So by that logic if I didn't ever listen closely to wanksta then I shouldn't know what g unit means right?
This made it past MANY levels in the company before getting posted to the website.
No way it gets posted without being on purpose
@ assuming the child is African American.It could very likely be a Photoshop on a stock image... which brings up the question why must you use the AA child?
Comparing this to broken guitars?
Blaming the mom?
Why did i even bother replying?
Do you get how many times an idea has to pass through different hands before it gets approved. ? Like when that minor league team had “Caucasian heritage night” and had to cancel it the last minute.
I don’t put the whole responsibility of that on the momyou not special I brought it up earlier about blaming the mom and the next person that does it I'll say som
If we being realWhat's wrong with white people celebrating their heritage as long as they don't bring up certain things then I see no problem. Also they shouldn't call it White Power Night.
If we bring real
What heritage do they have???
Seems like they try to take everyone else’s
Oh deadass. I’m not arguing whether the picture is right or wrong or could be taken as racially offensive.
I was just asking some questions trynna contribute to the thread.
Let me be clear - this should have NEVER made it through, and H&M should lose a lot of business for not having a team to stop and question this.
Also, H&M makes tiny *** clothes.. a XL fitting like a damn M out here. So they can burn for that, too.
One thing folks have mentioned that the photo could be a stock image and the hoody was PS’ed on without the parents knowledge.
PossibleOne thing folks have mentioned that the photo could be a stock image and the hoody was PS’ed on without the parents knowledge.
Also a possibility.
She would have had to sign a waiver to use his face but maybe they didn’t disclose what it would be used for. Could have had him pose in blank clothes for PS purposes.
Exactly. Not saying it’s the case but it’s a very real possibility in this day and age. I’m sure they will be issuing a statement but I wonder how timely.