So, let me break this down for readers who may randomly land on this sneaker forum and are unfamiliar with the Niketalk eco-system: the process below is called "framing", where faceless users with no historical background information, somehow have people who agree with their mental assessment of other users. I know you may be wondering, in the age of Instagram, Twitter, Facebook or Snapchat why hide your face?
Now mind you, if you're sane and logically like I am, you would ask "how can they make accusations about anyone, online?" Faceless at that.
Let's be real for a second (and I'm still EXCLUSIVELY leaving this message for random readers who haven't signed up for NT),
1. They're either a system of control employed by this forum's staff to steer the conversation into a space which reflect's Niketalk's "brand".
2. Users who know each other offline and like they've admitted in this thread are themselves "trollin'"
3. Actual individuals who clearly have social anxiety, are afraid to be open and share their worldview for the sake of discussion.
Now this brings us to the fun part. Where you were doing a search, and search engines lead you to this thread. Or you're familiar with Niketalk but not the peculiar eco-system of "General", however, you end up in this thread.
The thread starter whose MOTHER is of Dominican descent, despises black-American ideologies of race. However he's a well known hypebeast, an avid sneaker collector who loves hip-hop music and African American Vernacular English (AVEE). Yet he doesn't identify with his black skin complexion which is scientifically proven to be because of his 85% African ancestry. He frustratingly responds to me blatantly and indirectly post for post the last 10 pages.
Now on page 15-16 after I've posted nothing but facts, as any sane person would, I'm now being told that that's considered "trolling". However, the thread starter has the ability to do a Google Image search on a specific test census from over five years ago
AND even rename the img tag. He does this omitting any acknowledgement of his black heritage (an ongoing recognized shtick), yet he's exempt by these faceless users of "trolling" accusations.
Oddly, me leaving nothing but valuable information over five pages which you can read for yourself, somehow transforms into me being "obsessive", "needing mental help", "attention seeking" and jabs at fashion sense which isn't even mine but another user they've mistaken me for. Keep it mind these are "faceless" users with ZERO verifiable background, even on a superficial level. The same ones claiming "it's not that serious".
Even typing this out I'm almost laughing out loud at the audacity of these mysterious self-righteous users. The internet is "not that serious", yet you keep returning to a race thread to express your discontent for me posting NOTHING but facts.
I need mental help, and I'm attention seeking yet I consciously haven't answers a couple of derailing responses. Keep in mind they've attempted to get my attention several times, as part of this "framing" so that I can be the one accused to "derailing" this thread.
A quick read which would take about 15-20 would demonstrate that these user have contributed nothing of value to this thread. Not even their flawed mental assessment claiming I need to seek help, or I'm some sort of school shooter
.
Their next tactic is to create a flurry chaotic responses. Figuratively it would look like a school of piranhas eating their prey in shallow waters; to the point that
YOU the random reader would be deterred from investigating and reading for yourself just how preposterous it all looks if this thread is read in its entirety.
....so recap, if I post facts, and offer to pay for a $50 DNA test on a sneaker forum where average uses have purchased a basketball shoe in upward of $250, and flaunt their wealth and "good jobs" daily, "I'm taking it too seriously".
But these same users, can accuse someone they've never met of having a "school shooter" mentality, and they're ANONYMOUS. A far more serious actuation than paying for a registered DNA test with a traceable credit.
Although I've only quoted five preposterous responses, there's more. Yet they claim I'm "attention seeking"