- Mar 30, 2007
- 151,319
- 202,771
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Summarize in one short paragraph: The Palestinian Authority is working with US officials on a plan to run Gaza once the war between Israel and Hamas is over, the Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammad Shtayyeh has said.
Shtayyeh said he did not think Israel could destroy Hamas and that his preferred solution was for Hamas to become a junior partner in the umbrella Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) and help build an independent Palestinian state in the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem.
“If [Hamas] are ready to come to an agreement and accept the political platform of the PLO, then there will be room for talk. Palestinians should not be divided,” Shtayyeh said in an interview with Bloomberg.
“We need to put together a mechanism, something we’re working on with the international community. There will be huge needs in terms of relief and reconstruction to remedy the wounds.”
US officials have been pushing for the PA, which exercises limited self-rule in parts of the occupied West Bank and also ruled Gaza until it was driven out by Hamas in 2007, to play a key role in governing postwar Gaza, and have floated the idea of an international force helping to manage security in the enclave for an interim period.
However, Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has rejected the idea of the PA being involved in Gaza’s postwar governance, and ruled out accepting an international peacekeeping force in the enclave, insisting only Israeli forces could ensure his country’s security.
I think it’s bc US doesn’t want it. There have been 66 casualties in Syria and Iraq on the US side (mostly injuries but serious enough to ship the guys back to USA). In any other time that would mean war.
Hezbollah been liquidating many Israeli soldiers in the north. In any other time the US ships would be firing rockets at Lebanon.
Yemen. Forget about it. They woulda been nuked by now.
US is anemic right now. Money wise. Weapons wise. Foot soldier wise and MOST IMPORTANTLY- reputation wise.
In grand scheme of things, this war is still “early”
Link??
There are bigger concerns than winning an election.It's 2024 election season.
I think Biden is just riding it through to appease to his biggest donors, AIPAC.
WrongThere are bigger concerns than winning an election.
Considering that Turkey and the US are on the opposite sides of this conflict, a wider war in the Middle East risks weakening NATO. NATO without Turkey strengthens Russia's ability to reclaim its old vassals. I want to think that the US cares more about this alliance than the Israeli partnership.
I also want to think that the US cares about keeping the Suez Canal open, and one way to do that without committing forces is to not weaken its relationship with Egypt.
Besides the Israeli right-wing and Hamas, the only entities that would benefit from a wider war are US adversaries.
Lol no.Wrong
You gotta stop thinking of Israel as a strategic ally but rather being part of the US. They own congress. Big donors own them. It’s not a “we support them bc they are allies…”
It’s more like “they are us. We are them”
The guy Joe Biden sent to go negotiate with Israel recently is an Israeli born IDF serving department of energy guy. You really think that guy is fit to represent America in such a situation?
Seems like the Houthis in Yemen may declare war or start attacking American/all other ships that try and cross into the Red Sea. Israel has said they will attack Yemen if we don't.
Anyone remember DJBANA on here? Didnt know she was a zionist
If true, would make sense since most of the attacks on Israelis are while they sit in their tanks. I imagine once they get hit and catch fire, it’s like being in the worst car accident of your life
5000 idf soldiers.***Lmaooo Foh with that bull****, the images of these “wounded” soldiers would be all over our feeds, mareas we get the IDF dancing and singing on top of rubbles