- 8,323
- 730
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2007
yep.
Lock please, thanks. Warriors 2011/2012 Thread Up.
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by luong1209,
- Start date
- 33,347
- 15,147
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2009
Steph and Klay could end up being one of the greatest shooting tandems ever. But if you don't trade Monta for Iggy you're going to get 130 points dropped on you every night.
- 33,347
- 15,147
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2009
Steph and Klay could end up being one of the greatest shooting tandems ever. But if you don't trade Monta for Iggy you're going to get 130 points dropped on you every night.
- 17,236
- 1,943
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2006
Houston
.
- 17,236
- 1,943
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2006
Houston
.
- 9,737
- 205
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2004
If the Warriors are looking to get a star in return for Ellis, they might as well keep him forever. I am all for keeping him for this season and seeing how the team plays with an actual Center (if they can actually get one). Hopefully they can help Monta with some of his bad habits cause he's shown that he can be a decent defender at times.
- 9,737
- 205
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2004
If the Warriors are looking to get a star in return for Ellis, they might as well keep him forever. I am all for keeping him for this season and seeing how the team plays with an actual Center (if they can actually get one). Hopefully they can help Monta with some of his bad habits cause he's shown that he can be a decent defender at times.
- 7,568
- 32
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2005
Would you take Biedrins for a Chuck Hayes?
- 7,568
- 32
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2005
Would you take Biedrins for a Chuck Hayes?
- 8,323
- 730
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2007
wut?
if you're asking who i'd rather have, it's Hayes no question.
- 8,323
- 730
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2007
wut?
if you're asking who i'd rather have, it's Hayes no question.
- 24,717
- 436
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2006
I'd actually take Biedrins, I still believe the guy can do something.
I would've taken that #11 for Arthur trade though.
Monta also said he didn't want to be apart of Steph, and thought he wanted a trade then.
But, this is a little different, as Klay is the same position as Monta.
I don't know, a lot of question marks with the team, not many answers.
I would've taken that #11 for Arthur trade though.
Monta also said he didn't want to be apart of Steph, and thought he wanted a trade then.
But, this is a little different, as Klay is the same position as Monta.
I don't know, a lot of question marks with the team, not many answers.
- 24,717
- 436
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2006
I'd actually take Biedrins, I still believe the guy can do something.
I would've taken that #11 for Arthur trade though.
Monta also said he didn't want to be apart of Steph, and thought he wanted a trade then.
But, this is a little different, as Klay is the same position as Monta.
I don't know, a lot of question marks with the team, not many answers.
I would've taken that #11 for Arthur trade though.
Monta also said he didn't want to be apart of Steph, and thought he wanted a trade then.
But, this is a little different, as Klay is the same position as Monta.
I don't know, a lot of question marks with the team, not many answers.
- 15,437
- 182
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2007
Call me skeptical, but I don't believe this latest Monta rumor. Vecsey cited "Word has it." Not even an unnamed source or whatever.Originally Posted by JapanAir21
Monta also said he didn't want to be apart of Steph, and thought he wanted a trade then.
But, this is a little different, as Klay is the same position as Monta.
I don't know, a lot of question marks with the team, not many answers.
Remember, this is supposed to be a "new and more matured" Monta. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt before I believe "Word has it."
- 15,437
- 182
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2007
Call me skeptical, but I don't believe this latest Monta rumor. Vecsey cited "Word has it." Not even an unnamed source or whatever.Originally Posted by JapanAir21
Monta also said he didn't want to be apart of Steph, and thought he wanted a trade then.
But, this is a little different, as Klay is the same position as Monta.
I don't know, a lot of question marks with the team, not many answers.
Remember, this is supposed to be a "new and more matured" Monta. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt before I believe "Word has it."
ham city
Banned
- 10,116
- 202
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2009
I'm high on our picks. Some solid additions.
ham city
Banned
- 10,116
- 202
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2009
I'm high on our picks. Some solid additions.
- 9,737
- 205
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2004
I don't believe that Monta can be upset over this pick. The team had no other 2 on the roster and I'm sure Monta knows that he's a way better player than Thompson anyways.
- 9,737
- 205
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2004
I don't believe that Monta can be upset over this pick. The team had no other 2 on the roster and I'm sure Monta knows that he's a way better player than Thompson anyways.
- 15,437
- 182
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2007
Remember, Monta Ellis says he's top 2 in the league.
- 15,437
- 182
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2007
Remember, Monta Ellis says he's top 2 in the league.
- 43,542
- 27,838
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2002
Too many scorers on the team now. This could be a good and bad thing.
- 43,542
- 27,838
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2002
Too many scorers on the team now. This could be a good and bad thing.
- 3,210
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2008
I'd trade Biendrins away in a heartbeat, you guys need to factor in their contracts, which is horrible.
Warriors already have David Lee and Udoh at the PF position, don't need to trade for another PF.
- 3,210
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2008
I'd trade Biendrins away in a heartbeat, you guys need to factor in their contracts, which is horrible.
Warriors already have David Lee and Udoh at the PF position, don't need to trade for another PF.
