sillyputty
Banned
- 3,634
- 21
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2011
Originally Posted by cartune
Putty its not about the devil
Its about the demons all of us deal with on a daily
There is a "conversation" he has with the devil but I dont think it was meant to be taken seriously but the message that was given was universal
He even speaks against how the church raises people to not think for themselves
Its not a religious book
This my point...
I know its not a religious book per se...but he has these overtones that self-help "gurus" have been able to capitalize off of by scamming those who don't actually care to investigate their claims. They're just riding the coat-tails of the culture they're trying to influence.
Also its disingenuous to speak on his behalf and say its not a religious book...well why make those overtones? Hell, in the video posted thats half of what he talks about.
Again...is having a positive attitude a good thing? Yes.
Is learning to maximize your talents and understand your own bias beneficial? Yes.
Is relating this to some sort of mystical spiritual power useful? No.
In undergrad I took this easy PE course about positive thinking or something...basically we were using Stephen Covey's "7 Habits etc" book the whole time and I saw through it all. Its a famous book because he helped really sky rocket that self-help guru lane like Tony Robbins etc. Talking about "energy and etc"
Trust me on this...
There is a difference between having good thoughts and being a good person...and having to recognize a "creator" and make spiritual concessions of mentally blah blah blah. Its all pseudo-scientific garb beyond their superficial points. Trust me, I spend a whole semester just sitting there comparing all the major self-help dudes from ones that offered actual benefit.
You're more likely to get more self-help from a TED talk than someone likely to be on Oprah's couch.
he tries to sneak it by and get heavy into the spiritual woo-woo crap about "THINKING" about being rich will make you rich...without offering any suggestions about what actual rich people did.
My whole thing is, without getting too long winded is that he makes these outrageous claims that are not substantiated in any form.
Its kinda my beef with ancient texts...like just because there is some good stuff in the book doesn't mean the WHOLE book is good...there is a standard by which some arguments are good and some are bad.
Its like how people revere everything einstein said about "god" ...einstein was right on somethings, wrong on others...but people love to cherish every word that comes out of these names that have been deified as if they're some sort of enlightened truth...sometimes they're not.
Its more honest to judge each claim individually of the plausibility and veracity of the statement than to exalt each utterance as some sort of real revelation. People always want to take it to the extremes.
It also funny that he mentions andrew carnegie...yet there are theories that suggest he never even MET the dude. According to lore he met dude in 1908 which led Hill to interview a bunch of other successful people. BUT, Hill didn't publish anything until 1919 and Think and grow rich came out in 1937...and carnegie was dead by then. None of carnegies scholarly and researched biographies mention Hill at all...but they do mention Carnegie's own books...which have no mention of Hill either.
Dude seems to be an opportunist on selling junk wrapped in a candy layer.
It takes a lot more to THINK AND GROW RICH than just sitting there staring at clouds.
These are the dudes that Fortune 500 companies hire to come in and motivate cubicle drones.
I can't post it but just remember Dave Chappelle's skit on "The Secret"