Oakland RAIDERS Season Thread

http://www.csnbayarea.com/football-...o-3-Moore-vs-Routt?blockID=793835&feedID=2801

Raiders key matchup No. 3: Moore vs. Routt

Raiders WR Denarius Moore vs. Chiefs CB Stanford Routt

Tale of the tape
Moore (17): 6-foot, 195 pounds, second season, Tennessee
Routt (26): 6-foot-1, 195 pounds, eighth season, Houston

ALAMEDA -- As Denarius Moore became a training camp star last summer, the fifth-round draft pick had to victimize someone, right?

More often than not, Moore was beating Stanford Routt on his daily highlight film.

So guess who figures to line up across Moore on Sunday, and really, how weird will it be for Moore to see Routt lining up directly across from him?

"Normally I would say, 'Just take it as it is at practice,'" Moore said. "But now, he is on the other side of the ball, he is in a different uniform but I'm still going to take it play by play and try to compete and win the battle."

In fact, Moore, who has 21 receptions for 323 yards and a team-high three touchdowns, insisted there is no muscle memory from going against Routt last year.

"It doesn't matter, because at the end of the day I really don't remember…his technique, what he liked to do," Moore said. "He probably changed since then so I've just got to line up and compete."

After being cut in a cost-saving move by the Raiders on Feb. 9, Routt, a man-to-man specialist playing right corner, visited Buffalo and Cincinnati before signing a reported three-year, $20-million deal with $4 million guaranteed with Kansas City.

His "burn rate" of 58.1 percent (18 of 31 for 328 yards and a touchdown) thus far is much higher than his previous two rates, 39.4 percent in 2010 and 47.4 percent in 2011. And after having a career-high four interceptions last year, Routt has one this year, picking off New Orleans quarterback Drew Brees in Week 3. Routt also has 17 tackles, 16 solo, with two passes defensed and a forced fumble.

"Well, you know, Stanford has been learning our system," said Chiefs coach Romeo Crennel. "He’s been coming on. I think he had an interception. He had a rough outing the last time. He was in position to make plays, and we didn’t make them. The opponent made them. Otherwise, he’s been working well."

Moore will test Routt to see exactly just how well his transition is going.
 
1) Unless CP starts calling his own plays again...Moore will not be called on to do anything to test Routt. lol

2 "Routt, a man-to-man specialist" :rofl:
 
"Well, you know, Stanford has been learning our system," said Chiefs coach Romeo Crennel. "He’s been coming on. I think he had an interception. He had a rough outing the last time.


700
 
^I'm on there and I think a couple others on this board are too. But beware, there are more than a handful of idiots on that board.
 
I used to go on RF.net, but I couldn't stand all the dumb people that post over there. There isn't enough legitimate discussion on there, its just a bunch of hyperbole and homerism.
 
Wow. I don't know how I didn't find this message board until now, but this place is PACKED.

http://www.raiderfans.net/forum/forum.php

Next time someone tries to talk about our fan base not being that big a deal, I'm going to direct them to this site.

Yeah I'm on there too and like other have said there are a ton of idiots that post. It keeps me up to date on the latest with the team though.
 
I don't post on there I just read it but preseason is the best to be on :lol:

I still don't know why we cut Stevie Brown.
 
Last edited:
Cutting Brown was Al's call right? We could use him. I remember being extremely pissed about Sterling Moore getting cut then tearing it up for the Pats last season.
 
One day extension granted for Tampa Bay Game sell-out. Surprised it didn't considering they were offering buy 2 tix for the price of 1 deal and coming off a victory while being 1 game behind the Broncos.
 
Hey everyone. Haven't checked in here for a few weeks. I really like our chances this week. Like said, stop the run and we should be OK.

I'm a member at RF.net and Prosportsdaily/Raiders (actually their most active forum). Unfortunately they're both consisted of jumping off the cliff posts, and "we should pick up this reject." I still check them daily, but the idiotic posting really gets to me after awhile and I'm out.

We are really going to see what the Raiders are about these next few weeks. Ravens and Saints don't look as intimidating as they were in the offseason huh? we may actually win those games.
 
RF.net is just like Lakersground.net, with stupid fans and fans who know a ton of info. I just pay particular attention to the more informed posters and try to respond to productive topics.
 
Knapp admits ZBS not working and they needed to make changes


Raiders stopped hitting their head on wall running the ball
Published on November 1st, 2012
Written by: [email protected] (Vic Tafur)

A couple of times early this season, first-year Raiders coach Dennis Allen treated us to the definition of insanity when he was asked about the history of penalties and trying to instill some discipline.

“The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result,” Allen said. “We’ve got to change, and if we don’t change we’ll see the same results.”

The quote also works with Oakland’s run game this season. It is currently ranked 30th in the league and Allen and his staff have shown they are not insane by using more power-blocking schemes the last three games. Players like center Stefen Wisniewski appreciate it.

“Coming in was ‘zone, zone, zone, zone.’ But I think they’re starting to get to know us better,” Wisniewski said, “and we’re getting to know them and so they’re seeing that we can be successful doing both.”

The Raiders had 95 yards on 20 carries in the fourth quarter Sunday against the Chiefs in what they hope was the start of something big rather than just trotting over the Chiefs’ carcass.

“We definitely increased our gap run-blocking scheme to get a better balance and to keep defenses honest and we’ve done it well,” offensive coordinator Greg Knapp said. ”So, we’ll keep that same kind of formula working, where it’s a good change-up for us to have some kind of gap-scheme along with that outside zone. But the big runs came on that outside zone for us.”

Yeah, Allen and Knapp are zone blocking guys so scrapping the scheme — where the line kind of moves together, blocking off an area as opposed to individual defenders in hopes that the running back can make one cut and hit daylight — is not an option.

But this is a nice in-season adjustment.

“It is nice,” Wisniewski said. “You know, (the power-gap), that’s more of the stuff we ran last year, so most of us have a lot of experience in that, where we’re still learning the zone scheme so it helps us because we’re familiar with it and also it’s a nice change-up. Teams aren’t sure what’s coming at them and it makes us more likely to be successful.”

The Raiders were ninth in the league is rushing last year behind Darren McFadden and then Michael Bush when McFadden got hurt. But Oak land struggled this season, whether it was due to changes and injuries on the offensive line or McFadden (438 yards, 3.3 a carry) running too much East and West instead of North and South when he didn’t see a hole to cut back into.

Knapp preached patience all year until he ran out of it.

“We had to make an adjustment, and that was a good adjustment for us,” Knapp said. “It really has paid off.”

Wisniewski said “it’s a good sign” when coaches aren’t bound to a scheme.

“We’re all excited about it,” he said. “It shows us as players that our coaches are willing to learn from us and work with us and that’s really comforting as players, to know.”
 
Back
Top Bottom