Official 2016 NBA Playoffs Thread: Conference Finals: Warriors / Thunder | Cavs / Raptors

Who is going to win the NBA Championship?

  • Golden State Warriors

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • San Antonio Spurs

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • OKC Thunder

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Cleveland Cavaliers

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Toronto Raptors

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Miami Heat

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
Status
Not open for further replies.
That Westbrook vine....wow. That's a grown man. L.A. will no longer claim him.
 
Which is why the league itself uses it.

Logical fallacy: appeal to authority

Kawhi Leonard's actual stats from the 2014-15 playoffs when he played 35.7 mpg

20.3 PPG
7.4 rpg
2.6 apg
1.1 spg
0.6 bpg
47% FG
42% 3FG
2.1 TO

Per 36 is make believe
 
Last edited:
Can't stand Russ mane :lol:. Super talented....but I see through the Myplayer stats. Tony Parker needs to become unwashed like he did las night....and realize he can torch Russ. That boy don't play no D.

And no KD slander. Y'all don't realize how crazy nice he is. His ironic "fake tough guy to media" image is very annoying though.
 
No, calling him that is "ridiculous."
 
Which is why the league itself uses it.
 
Logical fallacy: appeal to authority

Kawhi Leonard's actual stats from the 2014-15 playoffs when he played 35.7 mpg

20.3 PPG
7.4 rpg
2.6 apg
1.1 spg
0.6 bpg
47% FG
42% 3FG
2.1 TO

Per 36 is make believe
You posted these like these are bad.

Additionally, his PER 36 numbers from that playoff run are pretty much identical being that he did actually play 36 minutes per game.

Now at this point in the playoffs he's playing 5 less minutes a game (even still his per game numbers are fantastic) so PER 36 becomes an appropriate way to measure the numbers.
 
Using per 36 can be silly if people misuse it. If a guy comes off the bench and averages 14 minutes, there's no way of knowing if he could keep up his production for 36.

Kawhi's averaging 32 minutes. Nothing wrong with using his per 36 in this case.
 
You posted these like these are bad.

Additionally, his PER 36 numbers from that playoff run are pretty much identical being that he did actually play 36 minutes per game.

Now at this point in the playoffs he's playing 5 less minutes a game (even still his per game numbers are fantastic) so PER 36 becomes an appropriate way to measure the numbers.

Of course his per 36 is identical to his 35.7 mpg numbers :lol:. That was the point. But they are a lot different from this year's per 36 because he hasn't shown the ability to sustain those numbers with increased minutes in real life. Fatigue= lower percentages, increased turnovers etc. Even if it's only 4 minutes.

And yea his real life numbers are fine. Not quite superstar play IMO but good enough that it's silly to inflate them with make believe stats.

Using per 36 can be silly if people misuse it. If a guy comes off the bench and averages 14 minutes, there's no way of knowing if he could keep up his production for 36.

Kawhi's averaging 32 minutes. Nothing wrong with using his per 36 in this case.

Yea I would say there's something wrong because per 36 is an assumption that he would sustain/increase that production given more court time but reality would prove that to be false. There's a reason a coach like pop limits his players minutes throughout the season and the same reason holds true on a game to game basis.
 
Last edited:
If Westbrook learned how to be a pg he'd be dangerous but he's not cut out for it. He's a natural SG. OKC needs to let him loose if they want to win..
Does yesterday not qualify as letting him loose. He shot multiple step back threes, he dominated the basketball the entirety of the game, especially in the last two minutes and essentially froze out KD.
Nope, he was playing pg, or at least he was supposed to be sorta. The offense IMO would do better relying on Russ as the scorer he is, and not to dictate and control the offense.
 
 
Ch1YxB9WkAAho0P.jpg
 
Using per 36 can be silly if people misuse it. If a guy comes off the bench and averages 14 minutes, there's no way of knowing if he could keep up his production for 36.

Kawhi's averaging 32 minutes. Nothing wrong with using his per 36 in this case.

This
 
The two times he played more than 36 minutes he had 32 & 7 and 31 & 11. 63 points on 39 shots.

ASA :smh:
 
Last edited:
I hope the League just fines him for that shove if they suspend Teague for that I'm officially calling the higher ups some Betas man
 
The two times he played more than 36 minutes he had 32 & 7 and 31 & 11. 63 points on 39 shots.

ASA :smh:

That's two games bro. Out of 7. He averaged 35.7 in a 7 gamer last year and the numbers are a little different.
It doesn't change the fact that per 36 is nothing but an assumption. He had another game at 35 minutes where he had 14 points on 38%. Maybe he had such a high output in those two games because he had so many other games playing a lot less minutes so he was relatively fresh. He ran 28 and 26 minutes and then had two days off before that 32 and 7 game where he actually ran 42 minutes. Going by that logic he should put up those numbers if he ran 42 minutes every game, ridiculous. He had 3 days off before the 31 and 11. In real life production will fluctuate.
There's so many variables. I can't assume any player would just increase all their numbers by playing more minutes EVERY game and that's what per 36 wants me to believe, silly as hell IMO.
It's a flawed and fake stat that I personally give very little credence to.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom