- 106,744
- 52,913
- Joined
- May 31, 2004
Originally Posted by fraij da 5 11
4900 though...
i was giving mez %+*# on twitter for being too cheap to take the bet...$4,900...%%%**
:::[Official NFC Championship] San Francisco 49ers vs. New York Giants @ Candlestick:::
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by niketalker23,
- Start date
i was giving mez %+*# on twitter for being too cheap to take the bet...$4,900...%%%**
- 12,536
- 39
- Joined
- May 5, 2009
C'mon Sunday. Where you at?!
- 10,857
- 67
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2008
anyways its friday
GreenNGold89
formerly bbllplaya23
- 6,571
- 2,114
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2005
What's the latest word on Delanie? Questionable?
- 58,362
- 29,844
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2005
Wait, what? I haven't been checking this thread much, but a $5k bet? God damn! And let me tell you...Me telling someone that that is too much is worth noting. I'm a degenerate
- 88,659
- 47,830
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2000
so your willing to bet $1200 against a screen name....?Originally Posted by glasses
i have the $. like I said, name the "value" that you'll put your SN up for since you're such a boss
so if niners lose you give him 1200?
if giants lose he loses his screen name?
- 88,659
- 47,830
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2000
EXACTLY. i am horrified how some of you are riding with glasses
and hell somebody pay me $1200 and teams aint gotta lose. ill give them my sn right $+%!$@% now
- 14,132
- 285
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2004
Man, WHAT THE %+#@ is going on in this thread?
Cliffnotes please?
Cliffnotes please?
- 58,362
- 29,844
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2005
Word. I don't care which team I have, I'll put my screen name up against $1200 any day.
Soo...Which team do I got? I'll take that bet.
Soo...Which team do I got? I'll take that bet.
- 8,323
- 730
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2007
- 106,744
- 52,913
- Joined
- May 31, 2004
it's not like that
it's screename for screenname...or screename + money for screenname + money....loser is losing money and their screenname...i think
- 16,440
- 2,141
- Joined
- May 12, 2002
I'll sell my name for $1,200
- 58,362
- 29,844
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2005
Oh.Originally Posted by DeadsetAce
it's not like that
it's screename for screenname...or screename + money for screenname + money....loser is losing money and their screenname...i think
In that case I'll just watch.
- 12,102
- 1,410
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2008
this here is a bargain.Originally Posted by henz0
I'll sell my name for $1,200
- 14,132
- 285
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2004
LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO @ Henz. I want half b.
- 43,206
- 28,386
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2003
big j 33
Supporter
- 35,948
- 16,664
- Joined
- May 31, 2006
A bet of 4900 dollars is one of the funnier things I've read on here in some time.
So is this..
So is this..
Originally Posted by Al3xis
this here is a bargain.Originally Posted by henz0
I'll sell my name for $1,200
shatterkneesinc
Banned
- 22,524
- 2,383
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2005
this is henz0's sn we are talking about
for 1200 its a steal
for 1200 its a steal
T0INE
formerly toine2983
- 66,711
- 72,853
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2005
I was wondering why it had so many pages.
Originally Posted by FIRST B0RN
There is going to be some serious crow eating come Sunday night
Man.
Whoever wins the trolling will be epic by their fans. I foresee a few bans as well.
Originally Posted by Al3xis
this here is a bargain.Originally Posted by henz0
I'll sell my name for $1,200
As for the game, as much as it pains me to say this I think the Giants got this.
Both defenses are stout so the game will rest on which QB can make the most plays and avoid costly turnovers.
And though Alex Smith was great against the Saints I'd favor Eli putting the team on his back and leading them to a win.
- 28,059
- 9,181
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2007
I dont agree that the Giants are a different team. Its just a narrative made up to spice up the build up. The Giants are not a different team right now. That idea is ridiculous IMO. How are they a different team? They were one of the hottest teams in football in week 10. 6-2 on the season, with a 3 game winning streak....the last of which came AT New England. Im not saying the Giants cant win or that they arent hot right now, but they are no hotter now than they were when we met them the first time.
I agree that the week 10 game is irrelevant, but not because the Giants are some different team all of a sudden.
- 4,527
- 17
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2002
in terms of injuries and chemistry and defense, yes they are very different.
fewell definitely simplified his plan of attack
- 8,332
- 216
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2011
Originally Posted by henz0
I'll sell my name for $1,200
You have to do it correctly and go through Christie's or Sotheby's. We are talking about a cultural artifact here.
- 17,236
- 1,943
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2006
It's under 9000!Originally Posted by henz0
I'll sell my name for $1,200
- 21,951
- 1,398
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2003
Came in to say this pretty much. Osi and Tuck look a lot healthier, Bradshaw is playing (Boley was injured in the 2nd quarter that game as well), Nicks was just coming off a hamstring injury, and Manningham was still limping from that knee injury. Amazing what some health and a little confidence with winning experience can do.
I expect this game to just be an old school, hard hitting game, and I think the media is over-playing the weather since there really is nothing more to talk about (both are outdoor teams)
- 28,059
- 9,181
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2007
Agree to disagree damnitzdom. You guys have more chemistry now than when you did during your 3 game winning streak, which included the New England game? I dont buy chemistry at all. You guys were one of the hottest teams in the NFL, coming off of a signature win. Your chemistry was great.
And what is this health you speak of? You mean Bradshaw? Even if he scores a TD against us, I am really not all that concerned if Bradshaw being back is your idea of being more healthy.
IMO, you guys have a very good team. You are just inconsistent. You were hot at the beginning of the season, awful for a stretch, and then really hot again. Hopefully the bad Giants team shows up!
**EDIT*** Mez just saw your post. So your argument is that players who played against us in week 10 werent all that healthy and they are now? I STILL dont buy it. You point to receivers coming off injuries. They played and played well. So you guys are slightly healthier now. Doesnt make you a different team.
People forget Gore had 6 carries too.
And what is this health you speak of? You mean Bradshaw? Even if he scores a TD against us, I am really not all that concerned if Bradshaw being back is your idea of being more healthy.
IMO, you guys have a very good team. You are just inconsistent. You were hot at the beginning of the season, awful for a stretch, and then really hot again. Hopefully the bad Giants team shows up!
**EDIT*** Mez just saw your post. So your argument is that players who played against us in week 10 werent all that healthy and they are now? I STILL dont buy it. You point to receivers coming off injuries. They played and played well. So you guys are slightly healthier now. Doesnt make you a different team.
People forget Gore had 6 carries too.
