- 11,997
- 3,286
Obviously this is disingenuous because no one is arguing for blanket prohibition of guns. That’s not what the debate is around.
No one is arguing for a blanket prohibition on abortion either. That’s not what the debate is around.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Obviously this is disingenuous because no one is arguing for blanket prohibition of guns. That’s not what the debate is around.
Your stance is an exception for rape or incest?No one is arguing for a blanket prohibition on abortion either. That’s not what the debate is around.
Your stance is an exception for rape or incest?
The one thing ill never understand about anti abortion advocates.
they must realize that making abortion illegal won't stop abortions.
Yes, and for medical conditions which make the pregnancy/birth dangerous.
The issue, for me, is that at a certain point it becomes more like murder absent those exceptions.
Yea, that’s a de facto prohibition on abortions sans emergency or crime. If you’re being genuine about the discussion, that is.Yes, and for medical conditions which make the pregnancy/birth dangerous.
The issue, for me, is that at a certain point it becomes more like murder absent those exceptions.
Yea, that’s a de facto prohibition on abortions sans emergency or crime. If you’re being genuine about the discussion, that is.
And you trust the far right states to carve out the appropriate exceptions?
I disagree with you nonrespectfully. Shut the **** up with your ********. As a man how the **** can you justify forcing someone to have a baby. Then forcing child support onto men and creating a child who may be born into a situation of suffering and poverty and violence because the rest of this country is dog eat dog ****** up? All this does is create suffering but it makes Republicans feel righteous.Yes, and for medical conditions which make the pregnancy/birth dangerous.
The issue, for me, is that at a certain point it becomes more like murder absent those exceptions.
It didn’t take long at all. And he wonders why people are hostile towards his BS in here.And he is right back to bad faith
All of a sudden, Delk doesn't know the filibuster exist.
I disagree with you nonrespectfully. Shut the **** up with your bull****. As a man how the **** can you justify forcing someone to have a baby. Then forcing child support onto men and creating a child who may be born into a situation of suffering and poverty and violence because the rest of this country is dog eat dog?
And he is right back to bad faith
All of a sudden, Delk doesn't know the filibuster exist.
Proving my pointA bipartisan infrastructure bill passed. I’d like to see a bipartisan bill addressing abortion pass.
1) Do you think people in poverty don’t deserve to live? Because Republicans sure as **** do. Everyday they vote on policies that equate to “Drop dead” for all people1. Do you think that people in poverty don’t deserve to live?
2. I don’t think anyone should be forced to have a baby. That’s why I said the exceptions for rape, incest, and medical conditions.
I do think that—absent those exceptions—when people have made choices regarding sex, that after a certain point aborting the baby is more like murder. Is that 8 months? 7? I think that’s debatable.
I also don’t think men should be forced to pay child support. But if a man makes choices related to sex, that results in their baby, they absolutely should support the child. Not even sure why that’s an issue.
1) Do you think people in poverty don’t deserve to live? Because Republicans sure as **** do. Everyday they vote on policies that equate to “Drop dead” for all people
2. Late term abortions is a Republican talking point. The majority of abortions happen within the first 15 weeks of pregnancy. What Mississippi’s law does is target a much more cruel circumstances.
“Kimport, a medical sociologist at UCSF whose research focuses on gender, sexuality and social movements, followed up on the research in 2018 with 28 new interviews of women who got later abortions. She said about half were lacking critical health information about their fetus earlier in their pregnancy. Kimport described in an interview how one woman was told by her doctors that something in her 20-week scan looked suspicious but it wasn’t until weeks later that it was clear the fetus had significant abnormalities.”
Do you know who this law affects, people who have issues getting abortions earlier usually due to financial and/or local restrictions and both women who deal with unexpected significant birth defects.
The only reason I brought up child support is you seem like the type who would be a hypocrite on that issue and unsurprisingly you are.
None of this is going to happen.
Yeah but as a man who can’t you know get stuck having a baby… maybe you should you know let the women choose. Like the concept of being pregnant is so foreign to me as a man…. I can’t put it into any frame of reference, but then forcing someone to have birth… well it feels wrong. Like women are animals that I can force my judgement on. I don’t know I just know a lot of women, so this type of stuff it really annoys me.You didn’t answer my question, but I’ll answer yours.
1. No.
2. This Mississipi law doesn’t have anything to do with my personal position on abortion.
I don’t have any issue with an abortion in the first 15 weeks. I don’t have any issue with an abortion for medical reasons or because of rape or incest.
Beyond 5 months I think it starts being more like murder absent those other exceptions.
Yeah but as a man who can’t you know get stuck having a baby… maybe you should you know let the women choose. Like the concept of being pregnant is so foreign to me as a man…. I can’t put it into any frame of reference, but then forcing someone to have birth… well it feels wrong. Like women are animals that I can force my judgement on. I don’t know I just know a lot of women, so this type of stuff it really annoys me.
At what point does an abortion become more like murder?
Murder is already illegal
Once again a tattoo at 18 is nothing like pregnancy and potentially raising a child. Same for drugs and prostitution… and it’s not for men or women to make that decision for others it’s a single by single woman’s choice. Calling it Murder after you decided 15 is just as viable as a person who wants to call it murder after a day. It’s not a moral choice you can justify with a timeframe. That’s also not how this is going to end up. 15 weeks will be challenged somewhere else as 12 weeks and 2 and Eventually it will be banned in certain states and those states feeling smug will go after it nationally.I’m sure you understand that there are several laws that impact what men and women can and can’t do with their bodies.
It is illegal, for instance, to get a tattoo until you are 18.; It is illegal to murder other people (absent exceptions for self defense, etc); it is illegal to drive without a seatbelt; it is illegal to sell your body for sex in most states; it is illegal to take certain drugs, etc etc etc.
As it relates to abortion, I agree that people shouldn’t be forced to have a baby. I think women should choose. Ideally, people choose to make responsible decisions regarding sex.
But absent those exceptions for rape and medical conditions, you really have an issue with 5 months being too far to make the abortion choice?
At what point does an abortion become more like murder?