- 9,990
- 11,429
*Insert “Got ‘em” gif*
***Official Political Discussion Thread***
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by rico x hood,
- Start date
- 14,894
- 36,074
- 14,894
- 36,074
Very little has been said about "pro-lifers" attacks on those who protest against the SC decision:
Just like little has been said about the fact that "pro-lifers" have bombed abortion clinics and assassinated abortion providers.
We should all recognize religious fundamentalism when we see it and call it out.
Just like little has been said about the fact that "pro-lifers" have bombed abortion clinics and assassinated abortion providers.
We should all recognize religious fundamentalism when we see it and call it out.
- 7,087
- 5,371
Whew, I know you felt dumb when you found out it was an elephant embryo.
Let that pride go and sit out for a little bit
- 13,286
- 10,780
that is again one of those situations that needs to be set on whether one is deliberate or accidental. much so what is the difference between a homicide and murder. it is not like some of our laws are not being discussed.
could be. however, that doesn't change the fact that it is a human nonetheless. is an unborn child a persona non grata just because he/she didn't come out yet?
dblplay1212
Supporter
- 20,187
- 40,096
That's a weird deflection to avoid admitting your ignorance when you're trying to force your opinion on it on women.
- 13,286
- 10,780
baiting someone about a serious discussion and treat it as some sort of a win exactly prove the stupidity of some people. regardless of that, just because there are no identifying markers on an embryo doesn't prove the fact that it is a living organism that could develop into something or someone that the the embryo is designed for. so unless your point is to make fun of this discussion, there is no real purpose of going forward with some of you for trolling.Whew, I know you felt dumb when you found out it was an elephant embryo.
Let that pride go and sit out for a little bit
- 14,894
- 36,074
"All nine months of pregnancy should be recorded and saved on case fetal loss occurs. We shall examine what she consumed, where/how she traveled, what kind of shoes she wore, to be absolutely certain that she didn't deliberately lose the fetus"
Very reasonable idea...
Person, not persona non grata.
And yes, it legally isn't a person.
dblplay1212
Supporter
- 20,187
- 40,096
It could, but it hasn't at that point. That's why calling it a person is dumb. You can't even differentiate it from an elephant.
- 5,891
- 12,009
that's legit one of the best trap cards I've ever seen, literally put an elephant in the room.
dblplay1212
Supporter
- 20,187
- 40,096
I gotta give credit where it's due, saw it last week when Matt Walsh showed his ignorance.
aepps20
Supporter
- 42,507
- 90,676
dblplay1212
Supporter
- 20,187
- 40,096
- 4,704
- 12,927
Delk giving the cover for others to tell on themselves 
For a group that talks a big game about ending abortion, and is the dominant group in the states most likely to make abortion illegal, I've seen nothing from the non-Catholic evangelicals that suggests they have any intention of helping the women and children who will be impacted by the decision of this Court
For a group that talks a big game about ending abortion, and is the dominant group in the states most likely to make abortion illegal, I've seen nothing from the non-Catholic evangelicals that suggests they have any intention of helping the women and children who will be impacted by the decision of this Court
- 7,636
- 13,506
LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
- 7,636
- 13,506
We don't need to debate with someone who couldn't tell the difference between a human and an elephant fetus.
- 11,997
- 3,286
The elephant “gotcha” picture doesn’t really move the needle. Inability to identify the embryo’s species has no bearing on the fact that a human embryo would develop to a human being absent some other medical reason absent an abortion. Is the point that we should abort elephants? Just an odd analysis.
Surely, someone could post an image of a 15-week unborn baby that looks very different.
This is what an unborn baby looks like at 15 weeks. The question is whether killing this is more like murder absent exceptions for medical concerns, rape and/or incest. The majority of Americans agree with restrictions at this point. The elephant embryo is irrelevant to this convo:
Surely, someone could post an image of a 15-week unborn baby that looks very different.
This is what an unborn baby looks like at 15 weeks. The question is whether killing this is more like murder absent exceptions for medical concerns, rape and/or incest. The majority of Americans agree with restrictions at this point. The elephant embryo is irrelevant to this convo:
- 30,309
- 21,833
They do? The majority? 50.1% of Americans think that a 15-week and 1-day abortion is murder?
- 64,966
- 196,172
aepps20
Supporter
- 42,507
- 90,676
I didn't realize that a person that supports Pedophiles posts with such bass in his voice and fry grease in his hair.
- 11,997
- 3,286
Based on polling, the majority agree with restrictions at this point—which is what I wrote.
- 13,286
- 10,780
exactly. it didn't prove anything behind the rationale of justifying that it is not a living embryo. if some are making fun of this as if it were a joke and couldn't substantiate for their trolling other than act like a pack of hyenas, then I wouldn't entertain such behavior.The elephant “gotcha” picture doesn’t really move the needle. Inability to identify the embryo’s species has no bearing on the fact that a human embryo would develop to a human being absent some other medical reason absent an abortion. Is the point that we should abort elephants? Just an odd analysis.
Surely, someone could post an image of a 15-week unborn baby that looks very different.
This is what an unborn baby looks like at 15 weeks. The question is whether killing this is more like murder absent exceptions for medical concerns, rape and/or incest. The majority of Americans agree with restrictions at this point. The elephant embryo is irrelevant to this convo:
as far as the rape/incest scenario goes, it is a very thin line of justification between the two sides.
dblplay1212
Supporter
- 20,187
- 40,096
Would is the key word. It hasn't yet, therefore it's not "killing a baby."
dblplay1212
Supporter
- 20,187
- 40,096
You skipped it the first time I posted it again for you.
- 4,704
- 12,927
Hari-Kari on First Street
Hofstra Law professor Eric M. Freedman argues that the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization repudiates the Court’s delicate role in our democracy. Professor Fr...
verdict.justia.com
Similar threads
