- 29,804
- 39,630
- Joined
- May 25, 2004
The older I get the more left I get, I wouldn’t call myself a liberal though. I’d like to see the whole capitalist system just burn to the ground.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I’m not at all . Employers ask your preferred name for a reason. I have colleagues who are originally from countries like Korea, with names like Hyun bum but their preferred name is Robert. People have various reasons for preferred names. I’ll comply with them out of respect for them.It seems to me you drawn a pretty arbitrary line around "prefered name" vs "nickname" what makes one acceptable to not comply with vs the other.
I don’t agree with the reasoning or train of thought here at all.A pronoun is not like that, they are actually not the same sex as the corresponding pronoun. So by this logic, it IS similar to a nickname and it is totally reasonable to not comply.
See above for why the preferred name versus nicknames distinction you’re making doesn’t really follow — preferred names are more than just shortening. SomeIt seems to me it's the underlying fact that their name is that name and it is in fact short for X.
I agree with this actually because of the harm aspect — but both are showing a lack of respect for the person’s wishes which is at the core of my point.And even internet jokes, I think not calling someone by a preferred name is an acceptable joke, I don't youd accept misgendering someone as acceptable internet joke
You’re adding that it’s a “courtesy” in an effort to weaken the point. Shaking someone’s hand and calling them their preferred name thay they’ve requested to be called are vastly different thingsI admire your valor. If I do something as a courtesy I have the right revoke it. It is reasonable to shake someone's hand when you meet them,
I don't think it's unreasonable to revoke that courtesy if certain conditions are met.
Nah, I agree that it’s not appropriate for me to do so. But to make the comparison here more poignant — I’m also not a trans person and I don’t know how I’d feel if another trans person was violently anti trans daily, antagonizing other trans people in the thread and supporting anti trans politicians and policies. So I’m not sure that I can speak for how I’d behave in that situationWould you be comfortable misgendering a trans person on the internet, provided their internet sneaker forum posts were of low quality?
Looks like they're going to try and get something done under the Higher Education Act on student loans.
Bruh same. I've been radicalizing my own mother into a union-championing progressive the past couple years after she finally realizes how much she's been taken advantage of at her place of work, after decades of preaching how predatory and scummy unions are (lol). My dad (a Trump voting conservative) is next in my sights after he recently complained about how he's been passed over twice for promotions because of his age (at a oil/pipeline firm). That one's gonna be tougher.The older I get the more left I get, I wouldn’t call myself a liberal though. I’d like to see the whole capitalist system just burn to the ground.
No details yet. You'll have to wait and see.Something done like what?
Bruh same. I've been radicalizing my own mother into a union-championing progressive the past couple years after she finally realizes how much she's been taken advantage of at her place of work, after decades of preaching how predatory and scummy unions are (lol). My dad (a Trump voting conservative) is next in my sights after he recently complained about how he's been passed over twice for promotions because of his age (at a oil/pipeline firm). That one's gonna be tougher.
This case should have never made it this far
The frustrating thing about this case is that it involves an entirely fabricated legal dispute. Again, Lorie Smith has never actually made a wedding website for a paying customer. Nor has Colorado ever attempted to enforce its civil rights law against Ms. Smith. Indeed, in its brief to the Supreme Court, Colorado expressed doubt that its anti-discrimination law would even apply to Smith.
gry60 the more I learn about the shh the more baffling the shh is
that‘s a whole lotta money, time and hate being wasted/used on a damn hypothetical