- 43,199
- 28,364
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2003
You cherry pick yourself.Wonder how many people in this thread’s stance you already know? But it’s fun to just cherry pick me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
You cherry pick yourself.Wonder how many people in this thread’s stance you already know? But it’s fun to just cherry pick me.
I guess you missed the part where not just Cohen and David Pecker/AMI but the actual SDNY prosecutors told the judge that Individual-1 directed the commission of a felony.
I guess you could call it a flop if you don't actually read anything.
You cherry pick yourself.
The IC Inspector General referred Trump for potential prosecution but Barr quickly squashed that of course.
I think you've made your point clear by now that you support any and all violations or potential violations of the law by any Trump associates.Another flop
I think you've made your point clear by now that you support any and all violations or potential violations of the law by any Trump associates.
You know that Republicans are not interested in any violations of the law. In fact they actively shielded Roger Stone from prosecution for obstructing their committee until Mueller forced their hand. They knew Stone was lying to them because Stone publicly released communications that he unequivocally claimed not to have under oath, twice. They blocked motions to subpoena the communications that everyone knew Stone possessed, after all those documents would unequivocally prove Stone was lying.We can agree to disagree on this point.
“Transcript does not show clear quid pro quo” - CNN
"**** smeared on transcript and sent to Congress"
DWalk: See? Evidence!!
Unsurprisingly, the DOJ is lying about the content of the whistleblower complaint. The ICIG testified that the complaint involved a series of multiple acts.