***Official Political Discussion Thread***

Fiona Hill keepin it a 100 on how the Russian government been doing.
So it suits the Russian government for us to start blaming Ukraine and she said the Russians would make sure whoever they put their bet on would be beholden to their interests...trump and Rudy pushing the narrative that it was Ukraine...things that make you go hmmm
 
Random thought but I wonder if there would be a difference in how the public is impacted by these testimonies by having them done at night when people are home from work and catch it live. Instead of seeing it through the filter of clips/spin of Fox News later at night.
 
Random thought but I wonder if there would be a difference in how the public is impacted by these testimonies by having them done at night when people are home from work and catch it live. Instead of seeing it through the filter of clips/spin of Fox News later at night.

Nah.. I think being able to livestream on twitter or YouTube is huge for this.. and a crap ton of people having desk jobs

but Fox News was going spin or deflect no matter what
 
Random thought but I wonder if there would be a difference in how the public is impacted by these testimonies by having them done at night when people are home from work and catch it live. Instead of seeing it through the filter of clips/spin of Fox News later at night.

But then people would have to choose watching the testimonies over the new episode of whatever people watch on television these days and I don't think Americans want to watch the full proceedings and rather watch the highlights.
 
People will watch the full hearings instead of highlights because they can always go back and binge their favorite shows
Also remember you can go back and watch these hearings in their entirety on youtube
A lot of Americans want to know the truth because he's getting way too loose with his Russia love, and not every American is ready to fall in love with Russia
 
As much as people want to watch these proceedings I don't believe they are selecting the testimonies over their shows. Even if they can watch them later
 
People that have conversations with the president, people who are high ranking officials with knowledge of classified information, text messages provided etc

grapevine and hearsay according to that caller

The only person these people beleive is trump
 
God bless the people that have to vet C-Span callers

They need to stop taking calls from Alabama. Jesus christ :lol: :lol:

source.gif
 
We have witnesses who have testified there was no quid pro quo. And we have one witness that has testified there was.

We have no witness that directly links the president to an order to investigate the Bidens for political purposes in exchange for javelins.
One of the witnesses who testified that there was no quid pro quo blatantly lied under oath, magically refreshing his memory after he realized other witnesses cornered him. He then testified there was in fact a quid pro quo and refused to say whether he believed Trump when he dictated the "no quid pro quo" message to send to Bill Taylor.


Kurt Volker also appears to have lied in his deposition.
He testified that during the scheme, he was never aware of the link between Biden and the investigation demand. So in Volker's view, Burisma is just a Ukrainian gas company.
And yet, Volker agreed in mid August that the drafted statement should not explicitly mention Burisma because he believed it could be seen as interfering in the 2020 US election. Volker clearly knew of the link to Biden, otherwise he couldn't have linked a random Ukrainian gas company to the 2020 US election.
https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2019/10/Volker-Testimony-Long-Form.pdf
af557d0e8681e00264a0144ec9cd7cbb.png


In Volker's next opening statement for his public testimony, he tries to clean up the lie and omits the part where he linked Burisma to the US election.
https://www.axios.com/kurt-volker-o...ing-f322b39e-5daf-4b67-8db4-4daeb74e87ba.html
1cbcc1026242f480dac1f032d91c3dc1.png


Mick Mulvaney explicitly linked holding up the aid to the demands for the investigations and then told the public to "get over it."

Witness Tim Morrison testified that there was no quid pro quo but his testimony laid out all elements of one.
For example, he testified that Sondland told him on September 7 that the hold on the aid would be released if Zelensky committed to publicly announcing the Biden and 2016 investigations.

The next day, Sondland told Bill Taylor that Zelensky was going to bow to Giuliani and Trump's demands. Zelensky told Sondland in the call that he would make the statement during a CNN interview scheduled for September 13. By the time Zelensky caved in, the Ukrainians were aware of the hold on the aid and were unable to get a straight answer from anyone about the reason. The Ukrainians are not idiots, they can add 1+1.

A few days after Sondland secured the commitment from Zelensky, the hold on the aid was released. By then the WH had also fully reviewed the content of the whistleblower complaint. They released the hold on the aid only after they knew someone was blowing the whistle and shortly after they had gotten Zelensky to commit to making the public statement.


David Holmes confirmed key parts of Bill Taylor's testimony and other witnesses can corroborate Holmes' testimony.
https://www.axios.com/impeachment-h...ent-710df4ac-a4f7-497f-a2d2-a22978efac70.html
3ed6cad5eec4762cf0e4ba5db3748e56.png


Holmes describes Sondland's call to Trump, where Trump asks "so, he's gonna do the investigation?"
Sondland replied that Zelensky would do so.
80897ac0b4a615d4e8babbfd00b16f6f.png


After the call, Holmes questions Sondland about his conversation with Trump. Sondland replied that Trump didn't give a **** about Ukraine and only cared about "the Biden investigation" Giuliani was pushing. Giuliani has repeatedly confirmed that he was pushing for Ukraine to investigate the Bidens, and he also repeatedly stated that "everything [he] did" was for president Trump.
Trump referenced Biden several times in the July 25 call and has also openly called for China to investigate the Bidens.
61bf09589300260a27739e7c510563e8.png

2a337de5cd6c2a4b728389e25ef2d844.png


One of Giuliani's henchmen, after ditching the lawyer Trump personally signed off on despite claiming he doesn't know Parnas, now says he told the Ukrainians in May that if they didn't investigate the Bidens, US aid would be frozen and Mike Pence would not attend the inauguration. The aid ended up being frozen and Pence did not attend.
 
Back
Top Bottom