- 14,377
- 34,655
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2011
To Deuce King's post, not yours. So you don't know for a fact that they read what you posted.Likes and responses.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
To Deuce King's post, not yours. So you don't know for a fact that they read what you posted.Likes and responses.
so a lie is now an “aspirational goal”?!
hooooo boyyyyyy
Just because you say something doesn't mean that everyone has heard or read it.Many posters are aware I find it offensive because I told @deuce king that I found it offensive. But he proceeded to continue. Other posters liked the messages, responded, etc.
There was no meeting that I am aware of.
And not really a matter of previously made statements that are now at odds with more recent statements.
In any event, I brush it off mostly. Because when I respond it tends to derail the thread.
your ultimate conclusion requires you to make an assumption on what was known and the reasoning behind making statements.
This Maga supporter just said Presidental briefings are aspirational goals then deflected to Obama.
This isn’t even good trolling anymore. It’s just foolishness now.
dwalk31 this would seem like a lie to normal folks
Video emerges showing Trump talking about cutting pandemic team in 2018, despite saying last week 'I didn't know about it'
Video appears to contradict president's claim of ignorance about the cutswww.independent.co.uk
We were warned... we were warned
The example I gave is a perfect fit for the criteria you set in the quote I responded too. I find your response argument utterly ridiculous.This is what I mean by your ultimate conclusion of him telling a lie relies on assumptions you are making.
As it relates to the statements you mentioned they seem aspirational and like responses shot from the hip.
I think you can find a lot of similarities between that and "If you like your doctor you can keep your doctor." I wouldn't consider that statement by the prior administration a lie. But certainly factually inaccurate. Would you consider that a lie as it relates to the affordable care act? Or more an aspirational goal based on information known to the speaker at the time?