- 34,898
- 76,785
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2014
If that cost my membership, then so be it.
Now we're talkin.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
If that cost my membership, then so be it.
Now that you mention it, I can think of several people I know that have voted republican most of their lives, but now they're talking about which democrat they're gonna support in 2020.While I agree that many of his core supporters will defend him no matter what I’ve noticed a change in tone of conversation in some of the online political spaces I keep up with. Even with the hardcore supporters. The tone has shifted from “Trump is a true American who cares about American values”
To “we knew what we were getting”. One thing about having a white collar job in a blue collar industry is that I get some insight into white working class Middle class America. There are genuinely people that were able to pull a lever from trump simply because race and social issues dont show up in their lives. It’s something they hear about on tv but never see. It’s ignorance in its purest form. And we can talk about how that means white supremacy is working as intended in another conversation. But with that said, Trump is becoming more and more unpalatable for a lot people. And he has been since the 2018 elections. It is it enough to keep him out of office? I’m not sure. But the plausible deniability shtick in terms of his character is getting harder and harder to maintain.
Now we're talkin.
Now that you mention it, I can think of several people I know that have voted republican most of their lives, but now they're talking about which democrat they're gonna support in 2020.
As a lawyer, would you describe the following as a "nothingburger"?I can feel that the report was a nothingburger as there were no further indictments.
DWalk you are full of it. You are not just hear to offer a different take, you are here to antagonize. People are disrespectful toward you because you have been toward them.
You antagonize by quoting post with "YIKES". When you first got here there were other posters brushing up against the line on racial issues and when you saw members upset by this you poked them on those issues. You suggested that my deserve to help poor black people must be motivated by my families need for it. If some makes a figurative interpretation of something to demand a literal take. Then if someone makes a literal take you what to make a figurative take. You argue semantics when your argument runs out stem and demand evidence from people while hardly providing any yourself. You give cover to racist and bigots yet pearl-clutching when you think affluent white people have been attacking and use the oppression of minorities to draw some parallels. All the while giving little care for said oppression. You bait and bait and bait and then someone engages your main focus seems to talk in circles to frustrate them.
You are here to troll people, not offer a difference of opinion. You will call this place a echo chamber even when debates are going on among other members. Other people are not on the edge of being banned because other members don't have the long track record of insincere buffoonery you do.
Stop playing the victim, you are not one. Stop acting like you are taking a principled stance, you are not doing that.
You are just a troll who is doubling down on his schtick. Keeping going though, because I welcome the fallout from that decision
As a lawyer, would you describe the following as a "nothingburger"?
A subject in a criminal investigation, 3 days after finding out his personal conduct is under investigation for obstruction of justice, orders the firing of the Special Counsel knowing that he had no just cause to do after repeatedly being advised of that fact by his top advisers and the DOJ itself.
After the WH counsel initally refused to carry out the order, the subject pressured the WH counsel a second time to carry out the order. "Mueller has to go. Call me back when it's done."
2 days after ordering the removal of the Special Counsel, the subject under criminal investigation instructed an intermediary to pressure the recused Attorney General into obstructing the investigation by limiting the scope of the investigation to "only future election interference", thus blocking the investigation from investigating Russian interference in 2016 and obstruction of justice.
A month later, the subject under criminal investigation requested a status update from the intermediary about the task.
Within hours after the intermediary had made it clear he had not pressured the Attorney General yet, the subject under criminal investigation made it clear that the AG's job was in jeopardy.
When the press reported on the efforts to remove the Special Counsel without any valid cause, the subject under criminal investigation ordered the WH Counsel to publicly lie to the press and create a false record (for who?) stating no such order occurred.
Mueller specifically said in the report that if he could exonerate Trump based on the evidence, he would. But he was unable to do so based on the evidence.When I say nothingburger I am saying that it provided no indictments as it related to Russian collusion to influence the election and/or obstruction of justice related to such Russian collusion. Basically, it was nothing more than a bunch of circumstantial items that even Mueller could not say rose to the level of obstruction of justice. After two years, that is a "nothingburger" in my opinion compared to how it was hyped in the media.
Mueller specifically said in the report that if he could exonerate Trump based on the evidence, he would. But he was unable to do so based on the evidence.
Mueller also adds that another factor in deciding not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment was that a federal criminal accusation against a
This man gets it.The Mueller Report is untrue, filled with fabricated statements....The Mueller Report totally clears me.
Agreed, to some extent. The report makes it clear that the prosecutors set out to avoid making a traditional judgment one way or the other.The decision not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment is what really muddied this process. It is as if he wanted to give both sides talking points.
Again, you are not a victim.This is your opinion. It is incorrect. I assure you I know my intent better than you do. And it is to offer my opinion on political discussions. In this thread. There are posters in here who comment and we agree to disagree. I don't call them names or mock them, like you do.
I have talked about several issues on here. You just don't agree with them. You believe I am wrong, and that is your choice. But me being pro-life is not antagonizing you. Me supporting the tax plan is not antagonizing you. Me thinking that the continuation and rhetoric surrounding the Mueller probe was the result of sour grapes from Hillary losing the election is not antagonizing you.
Yea, I did the Yikes, wow, smh, etc to highlight the hypocrisy of the pearl-clutching of members on here that say they are appalled by the President's tweets and comments but say worse. If you notice, I have stopped using that because of all of the "antagonization" that many claimed. But, when I stopped, others did it instead (to mock me). But that is not counted as antagonization? When I post, people post sea lion gifs and memes but that is not antagonization?
I do not report any poster. I do not complain. I do "block users." And yet, I am the one that is antagonizing and trolling? It is not trolling because you disagree with me.
I want him banned now. He’s a racist, sexual abuse apologist, rapist apologist, etcI dont want to see DWalk banned until the other dozen+ investigations into Trump and Co are closed. Especially the SDNY investigation.
Only then will we have UNLIMITED POWER to strike down the OBSTRUCTIONIST LIBS and finally take our country back! No collusion! No obstruction! #MAKEWINTERFELLGREATAGAIN #MAGAFELL #2020toINFINITY
Yikes wow and smh. These personal attacks are something only angry libs would stoop so low for. I dont think I've EVER seen such hostility towards someone, especially the level of harrassment that our PRESIDENT ELECT has seen. Unpresidented the level of hatred that these pitiful hater libs are showing our Permanent President. Please, we must be civil. And own the libs once and for all.I want him banned now. He’s a racist, sexual abuse apologist, rapist apologist, etc
Oh and a complete fake
I want him banned now. He’s a racist, sexual abuse apologist, rapist apologist, etc
Oh and a complete fake