Yeah, we were discussing that in Bible Study a few weeks ago. What may have been a day for God may have literally been thousands or even millionsof years to us. Everything in the Bible shouldn't be taken literally, especially when you consider who might've been writing each book.
Originally Posted by soltheman
1.Originally Posted by SuperAntigen
1.
2. Quit getting your panties in a knot...it's was merely a "theory"...
3. Why would they need to "remodel" the entire Universe when they are simply altering the earth. If you want to talk about effects, then the reality of things are, the earth is a rather insignificant portion of our infinite Universe. The influence of our earth on the Universe can be likened to the influence of a fly on the entire human race...
Any significant effects to occur will most likely be temporal in nature...and if that's your case, then realize that every journey back and forward in time will result in these temporal disturbances...not just a journey where dinosaur fossils are implanted within the Earth's crust...If your argument hinges on the "development of evolution", once again realize that evolution is only significant in the context of the planet earth. Therefore, outside of earth, evolution is arguably null...
2. It wasn't personal or anything. I've just honestly never read anything that has irked me as much as that. Don't get your choppa suit caught up in a knot.
3. Because other planets obviously have evolution on a molecular level. Hence, burning hyrogen, then carbon, then converting into ??? depending on their size.
I wasn't really speaking on the part about changing aspects of the past. That, I can dig. It was the religious aspect of the evolution thing. It had nothing to do with anything intergalactic. You completely misunderstood the reason for my post.
No doubt lil bro. It's been a minute. I have to read the rest of this post, it's been a hectic day. But man, me and Jewels had a talk,we were already on the same page, but this dude hit me wit some knowledge through vids and literature. Man, I can't even front, I didn't even watchall of the videos because that %%!% was too much to digest.Originally Posted by DearWinter219
folks....... you just blew my mind wide open. We need to talk.
Oh, I'm sure once we're actually able to get people on other planets and their moons that are able to sustain life (there are at least afew in our solar system,) that we'll be able to find traces of life. We already know that there's water on other planets, and I'm sure that meansbacteria is there as well. And, I do believe that the conversion from Hydrogen to Carbon as evolution. In the very least, it's adaption, and that'sonly one step away. Also, I'd say that Earth would play a major part. I like to think of everything in terms of mathematical equations. If one value ischanged, then the entire equation changes. For example, if Earth wasn't present in our solar system, who's to say that Jupiter wouldn't suddenlytake a crash course to the Sun, which could, quite possibly, create a(nother) Big Bang.Originally Posted by SuperAntigen
...damn, my dude said choppa suit......+5 for that one man...
Now as for evolution on the molecular level, if you're talking Life forms, then I can see you point but then again, we still have no proof that life exist anywhere else in the Universe (even though personally I believe it does, but for the sake of my argument, i'd rather play the devils advocate card)...
But if you're strictly talking abiotic sub atomic particles...which I'm assuming you are because of the reference to burning hydrogen and carbon conversions, then I still stand by my earlier thesis simply because that kind of diversification is not really considered "evolution" in the sense of what we consider "evolution" to be. Furthermore, whose to say that carbon is the basal and necessary element needed for life in other parts of the universe. I mean, if you're well versed in this kind of discourse, and you seem like you are, then you should know that those particular laws governing the biotic and abiotic in our neck of the galaxy, may not neccessarily even apply to the next galaxy...or the majority of the Universe...so at the end of the day...your assumption that changing the "earth" would affect the entire universe is somewhat out there...even for this kind of discussion...
Edit:
So why is the "religion" aspect of my theory soooooooo farfetched...are you really that anti-religious that you cannot consider that alternate...
The thing about that is, the existance of God has not been disproved by science, and neither has the creation story. Science has simply thus far, presented other possibilities that seem more plausible...
...
Ahh...interesting. Im pretty sure if time travel does exist they have strict regulations on who can go into time and who cant. I doubt any regularfamily can go back in time to "vacation". Im pretty sure we've had some kind of future intervention but wouldn't have no idea.
Make sure u do!Originally Posted by I AM KNOWLEDGE
No doubt lil bro. It's been a minute. I have to read the rest of this post, it's been a hectic day. But man, me and Jewels had a talk, we were already on the same page, but this dude hit me wit some knowledge through vids and literature. Man, I can't even front, I didn't even watch all of the videos because that %%!% was too much to digest.Originally Posted by DearWinter219
folks....... you just blew my mind wide open. We need to talk.
It's like once you know the truth, or at least get a glimpse of the light, life is never the same. But of course people will think you are crazy. But "forget" it, it's a thin line between insanity and brilliance, and I think a select few cross that threshold often.
I'ma get at you tho.
Yeah, this is just an infinite sequence that keeps changing and getting more complex with each new pattern. Since this sequence began at the dawnof time, it's only a matter of time before we finally learn what the next pattern is going to be.
