dame theory
Banned
- 3,281
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2010
retrospect90 wrote:
Can you give me an example of contradictory statements or hypocrites and what bible you have read? I just want to know where you're coming from.
Proof of It being scientifically sound: Isaiah 40:22 "There is One who is dwelling above the circle of the earth, the dwellers in which are as grasshoppers, the One who is stretching out the heavens just as a fine gauze, who spreads them out like a tent in which to dwell"
It was not until over 200 years after this Bible text had been written that a school of Greek philosophers reasoned that the earth likely was spherical, and in about another 300 years a Greek astronomer (Eratosthenes i believe his name was) calculated the approximate radius of the earth. But the idea of a spherical earth was not the general view even then.
The fact that the books of the Bible were recorded by some 40 men as diverse as king, prophet, herdsman, tax collector, and physician. They did the writing over a period of 1,610 years; so there was no opportunity for collusion. Yet their writings agree.
Here are a few contradictions for you:
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/jim_meritt/bible-contradictions.html
http://www.ffrf.org/legacy/books/lfif/?t=contra
Plently there for your nightly reading.
You talking about the world being round doesn't equate to the use of ridding people of their blood as a modern technique to cure for disease. I thought the "earth was round" was too simple of an argument for you
maybe all their writings are all cohesive because they were all doctored! Maybe the translation you're reading isn't accurate. Does no one accept the notion that MAYBE when king james inferred much of what we accept as the bible that maybe they picked and choosed what to include in the book? Very selective. 1600 years after the writing started, it was finished...and yet even the most recent submissions are still the word of god and biblical worthy? You serious fam?