D
Deleted member 38307
Guest
4 - 20 was like a week ago..
if GOD exists... Question.
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by OrangeBlueGarden,
- Start date
D
Deleted member 38307
Guest
4 - 20 was like a week ago..
- 3,340
- 12
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2005
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_01.htmOriginally Posted by gambit215
Go right on ahead buddy..............
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_01.htmmore general for you. http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html#bestfit
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_01.htmnow evidence for God please?
and responses to other people's responses to your rant?
or can you not defend your beliefs because they are BASELESS?
- 3,340
- 12
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2005
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_01.htmOriginally Posted by gambit215
Go right on ahead buddy..............
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_01.htmmore general for you. http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html#bestfit
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_01.htmnow evidence for God please?
and responses to other people's responses to your rant?
or can you not defend your beliefs because they are BASELESS?
guess I have to make the key word bigger for you to see huh...........Originally Posted by Its That Dude
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_01.htmOriginally Posted by gambit215
Go right on ahead buddy..............
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_01.htmmore general for you. http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html#bestfit
at you acting like there's no evidence for the big bang
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_01.htmnow evidence for God please?
and responses to other people's responses to your rant?
or can you not defend your beliefs because they are BASELESS?
Theory -
a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.
Since you probably dont know what conjectural means Ill make it easy for you...
Conjectural- 1. Presumed to be true or real without conclusive evidence.
guess I have to make the key word bigger for you to see huh...........Originally Posted by Its That Dude
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_01.htmOriginally Posted by gambit215
Go right on ahead buddy..............
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_01.htmmore general for you. http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html#bestfit
at you acting like there's no evidence for the big bang
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_01.htmnow evidence for God please?
and responses to other people's responses to your rant?
or can you not defend your beliefs because they are BASELESS?
Theory -
a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.
Since you probably dont know what conjectural means Ill make it easy for you...
Conjectural- 1. Presumed to be true or real without conclusive evidence.
- 3,340
- 12
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2005
Originally Posted by gambit215
guess I have to make the key word bigger for you to see huh...........Originally Posted by Its That Dude
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_01.htmOriginally Posted by gambit215
Go right on ahead buddy..............
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_01.htmmore general for you. http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html#bestfit
at you acting like there's no evidence for the big bang
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_01.htmnow evidence for God please?
and responses to other people's responses to your rant?
or can you not defend your beliefs because they are BASELESS?
Theory -
a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.
Since you probably dont know what conjectural means Ill make it easy for you...
Conjectural- 1. Presumed to be true or real without conclusive evidence.
please. stop it.
- 3,340
- 12
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2005
Originally Posted by gambit215
guess I have to make the key word bigger for you to see huh...........Originally Posted by Its That Dude
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_01.htmOriginally Posted by gambit215
Go right on ahead buddy..............
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_01.htmmore general for you. http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html#bestfit
at you acting like there's no evidence for the big bang
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_01.htmnow evidence for God please?
and responses to other people's responses to your rant?
or can you not defend your beliefs because they are BASELESS?
Theory -
a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.
Since you probably dont know what conjectural means Ill make it easy for you...
Conjectural- 1. Presumed to be true or real without conclusive evidence.
please. stop it.
antonlavey
Banned
- 28,210
- 847
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2008
Originally Posted by gambit215
guess I have to make the key word bigger for you to see huh...........Originally Posted by Its That Dude
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_01.htmOriginally Posted by gambit215
Go right on ahead buddy..............
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_01.htmmore general for you. http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html#bestfit
at you acting like there's no evidence for the big bang
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_01.htmnow evidence for God please?
and responses to other people's responses to your rant?
or can you not defend your beliefs because they are BASELESS?
Theory -
a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.
Since you probably dont know what conjectural means Ill make it easy for you...
Conjectural- 1. Presumed to be true or real without conclusive evidence.
He provided evidence. Scientists provide evidence to support their theories and hypotheses. Lawyers present evidence to in defense of their cases. Where is the evidence for God?
p.s. i know you're going to somehow misinterpret this as me saying the big bang theory is true, that's not what I'm saying. There is evidence that supports the big bang theory but it is still a theory. Let's see some evidence for God.
antonlavey
Banned
- 28,210
- 847
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2008
Originally Posted by gambit215
guess I have to make the key word bigger for you to see huh...........Originally Posted by Its That Dude
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_01.htmOriginally Posted by gambit215
Go right on ahead buddy..............
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_01.htmmore general for you. http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html#bestfit
at you acting like there's no evidence for the big bang
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_01.htmnow evidence for God please?
and responses to other people's responses to your rant?
or can you not defend your beliefs because they are BASELESS?
Theory -
a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.
Since you probably dont know what conjectural means Ill make it easy for you...
Conjectural- 1. Presumed to be true or real without conclusive evidence.
He provided evidence. Scientists provide evidence to support their theories and hypotheses. Lawyers present evidence to in defense of their cases. Where is the evidence for God?
p.s. i know you're going to somehow misinterpret this as me saying the big bang theory is true, that's not what I'm saying. There is evidence that supports the big bang theory but it is still a theory. Let's see some evidence for God.
- 17,299
- 8,980
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2003
Originally Posted by AntonLaVey
Originally Posted by gambit215
guess I have to make the key word bigger for you to see huh...........Originally Posted by Its That Dude
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_01.htm
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_01.htmmore general for you. http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html#bestfit
at you acting like there's no evidence for the big bang
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_01.htmnow evidence for God please?
and responses to other people's responses to your rant?
or can you not defend your beliefs because they are BASELESS?
Theory -
a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.
Since you probably dont know what conjectural means Ill make it easy for you...
Conjectural- 1. Presumed to be true or real without conclusive evidence.
He provided evidence. Scientists provide evidence to support their theories and hypotheses. Lawyers present evidence to in defense of their cases. Where is the evidence for God?
p.s. i know you're going to somehow misinterpret this as me saying the big bang theory is true, that's not what I'm saying. There is evidence that supports the big bang theory but it is still a theory. Let's see some evidence for God.
He provided evidence to support their theory. I can provide numerous personal experiences that support my theory. There is no difference, since neither can be proven true or false.
Like I said, there is no difference between science and religion.
- 17,299
- 8,980
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2003
Originally Posted by AntonLaVey
Originally Posted by gambit215
guess I have to make the key word bigger for you to see huh...........Originally Posted by Its That Dude
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_01.htm
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_01.htmmore general for you. http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html#bestfit
at you acting like there's no evidence for the big bang
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_01.htmnow evidence for God please?
and responses to other people's responses to your rant?
or can you not defend your beliefs because they are BASELESS?
Theory -
a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.
Since you probably dont know what conjectural means Ill make it easy for you...
Conjectural- 1. Presumed to be true or real without conclusive evidence.
He provided evidence. Scientists provide evidence to support their theories and hypotheses. Lawyers present evidence to in defense of their cases. Where is the evidence for God?
p.s. i know you're going to somehow misinterpret this as me saying the big bang theory is true, that's not what I'm saying. There is evidence that supports the big bang theory but it is still a theory. Let's see some evidence for God.
He provided evidence to support their theory. I can provide numerous personal experiences that support my theory. There is no difference, since neither can be proven true or false.
Like I said, there is no difference between science and religion.
antonlavey
Banned
- 28,210
- 847
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2008
Like? Let's hear it. Keep in mind that in science evidence is based on observation and the ability to reproduce said observation and experiments. So if I discover that 2 elements can be combined to make another in a carefully calculated proportion of each, i should be able to do this every single time.Originally Posted by NikeTalker23
Originally Posted by AntonLaVey
Originally Posted by gambit215
guess I have to make the key word bigger for you to see huh...........
Theory -
a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.
Since you probably dont know what conjectural means Ill make it easy for you...
Conjectural- 1. Presumed to be true or real without conclusive evidence.
He provided evidence. Scientists provide evidence to support their theories and hypotheses. Lawyers present evidence to in defense of their cases. Where is the evidence for God?
p.s. i know you're going to somehow misinterpret this as me saying the big bang theory is true, that's not what I'm saying. There is evidence that supports the big bang theory but it is still a theory. Let's see some evidence for God.
He provided evidence to support their theory. I can provide numerous personal experiences that support my theory. There is no difference, since neither can be proven true or false.
Let's here your evidence?
antonlavey
Banned
- 28,210
- 847
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2008
Like? Let's hear it. Keep in mind that in science evidence is based on observation and the ability to reproduce said observation and experiments. So if I discover that 2 elements can be combined to make another in a carefully calculated proportion of each, i should be able to do this every single time.Originally Posted by NikeTalker23
Originally Posted by AntonLaVey
Originally Posted by gambit215
guess I have to make the key word bigger for you to see huh...........
Theory -
a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.
Since you probably dont know what conjectural means Ill make it easy for you...
Conjectural- 1. Presumed to be true or real without conclusive evidence.
He provided evidence. Scientists provide evidence to support their theories and hypotheses. Lawyers present evidence to in defense of their cases. Where is the evidence for God?
p.s. i know you're going to somehow misinterpret this as me saying the big bang theory is true, that's not what I'm saying. There is evidence that supports the big bang theory but it is still a theory. Let's see some evidence for God.
He provided evidence to support their theory. I can provide numerous personal experiences that support my theory. There is no difference, since neither can be proven true or false.
Let's here your evidence?
- 17,299
- 8,980
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2003
Well in this aspect they are very difference because as you know religion is spiritual. There obviously isn't going to be an equation to prove god exists and honestly I don't need one. All I can go by is what I've experienced and felt.
Plus, he's trying to prove that the big bang theory is FACT when it's not it's just a theory, while at the same time being disrespectful and immature trying to ridicule MY beliefs. "God is evil". If God doesn't exist to him, how could he be evil?
I can post my stories all I want but let's be honest, most other non-religious people are going to do discredit my experiences and mock me, so what's the point? At the end of the day they're personal experiences that only I've gone through to provide ME with proof of god and nobody else. All that matters to me is that I know what I've experienced, I know what I've been through, and all it has done is solidified MY belief in god. I've never tried to pass off my beliefs as fact to anybody else the way he is, and I respect everybody else's beliefs
- 1,661
- 81
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2011
You're insisting on using the everyday definition of the word "theory". The word "theory" differs in the context of science.Originally Posted by NikeTalker23
Originally Posted by AntonLaVey
Originally Posted by gambit215
guess I have to make the key word bigger for you to see huh...........
Theory -
a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.
Since you probably dont know what conjectural means Ill make it easy for you...
Conjectural- 1. Presumed to be true or real without conclusive evidence.
He provided evidence. Scientists provide evidence to support their theories and hypotheses. Lawyers present evidence to in defense of their cases. Where is the evidence for God?
p.s. i know you're going to somehow misinterpret this as me saying the big bang theory is true, that's not what I'm saying. There is evidence that supports the big bang theory but it is still a theory. Let's see some evidence for God.
He provided evidence to support their theory. I can provide numerous personal experiences that support my theory. There is no difference, since neither can be proven true or false.
Like I said, there is no difference between science and religion.
- 1,661
- 81
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2011
You're insisting on using the everyday definition of the word "theory". The word "theory" differs in the context of science.Originally Posted by NikeTalker23
Originally Posted by AntonLaVey
Originally Posted by gambit215
guess I have to make the key word bigger for you to see huh...........
Theory -
a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.
Since you probably dont know what conjectural means Ill make it easy for you...
Conjectural- 1. Presumed to be true or real without conclusive evidence.
He provided evidence. Scientists provide evidence to support their theories and hypotheses. Lawyers present evidence to in defense of their cases. Where is the evidence for God?
p.s. i know you're going to somehow misinterpret this as me saying the big bang theory is true, that's not what I'm saying. There is evidence that supports the big bang theory but it is still a theory. Let's see some evidence for God.
He provided evidence to support their theory. I can provide numerous personal experiences that support my theory. There is no difference, since neither can be proven true or false.
Like I said, there is no difference between science and religion.
- 17,299
- 8,980
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2003
Well in this aspect they are very difference because as you know religion is spiritual. There obviously isn't going to be an equation to prove god exists and honestly I don't need one. All I can go by is what I've experienced and felt.
Plus, he's trying to prove that the big bang theory is FACT when it's not it's just a theory, while at the same time being disrespectful and immature trying to ridicule MY beliefs. "God is evil". If God doesn't exist to him, how could he be evil?
I can post my stories all I want but let's be honest, most other non-religious people are going to do discredit my experiences and mock me, so what's the point? At the end of the day they're personal experiences that only I've gone through to provide ME with proof of god and nobody else. All that matters to me is that I know what I've experienced, I know what I've been through, and all it has done is solidified MY belief in god. I've never tried to pass off my beliefs as fact to anybody else the way he is, and I respect everybody else's beliefs
- 328
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2008
- 328
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2008
- 9,634
- 6,433
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2006
executed perfectly you have...Originally Posted by HankMoody
- 9,634
- 6,433
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2006
executed perfectly you have...Originally Posted by HankMoody
- 17,299
- 8,980
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2003
Anton this is what I want you to get out of what I'm trying to say.
I'm not trying to discredit science. I'm not trying to say that my religious beliefs are right. Both are theories. Both can't be proven right or wrong. They're both hard to believe. We should just respect each others opinions and leave it at that.
I'm not trying to discredit science. I'm not trying to say that my religious beliefs are right. Both are theories. Both can't be proven right or wrong. They're both hard to believe. We should just respect each others opinions and leave it at that.
