- 624
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2007
Originally Posted by HueyP in LouieV
Originally Posted by airmaxpenny1
Thats why you my dude AMP.
Like I said certain dudes pick up on things, certain dudes don't.
I was just trying to put y'all on to the hidden images in the video. I didn't want to take it to this deep of a level. But since we're already there...
The constitution is a Masonic document. Masonry is based off of Moorish law, which is based off of Islamic law carried brought into Europe, sparking the "renaissance" (). Just listen to Obama's Egyptian speech. Check how many times the term "free man/men" is used in the constitution. It has a particular meaning in the law and that law has an indisputable history.
�
"Blacks" and "Hispanics" don't know their true national identities. Black is color of a crayon, not a national identity. And African-American is clearly a distinction from a true "American". There is a reason why "minorities" can be done so dirty under this system of the law and why nations can be established for particular groups. There are multiple tribes Israel.
People are forgoing their sovereign birthrights and accepting any ever changing brand of identity placed on them . If we knew our true identity and history, reparations would be the last thing on our minds. Thats the Bey and Cherokee part.
Moor Gone
Free Man
Blacks Also Owned Miles of� US Pre-Columbian Lands
By Paul Barton, editorial, TOMRIC Agency (Dar es Salaam), 25 May 2001 Washington D.C.�
One of the saddest aspects of enslavement in the Americas, particular North America, is the fact that all forms of education was denied us and still is today. Blacks were forced to remain ignorant and told they have no history or culture.�
Well, here is the problem, most African-Americans are still void of historical knowledge particularly of their ownership to lands right here in the U.S.�
Blacks owned about one million square miles of land in the Louisiana Territories and the South Eastern/Florida region, as well as California. In all these areas of the U.S., there were Black African-American nations before Columbus, who were targeted for enslavement due to the Papal Edict that gave the Christian nations of Europe the go-ahead to make slaves of all descendants of Ham found in the newly discovered lands This fact cannot be denied. The essay on Black Civilizations of Ancient America, published as the great book; Susu Economics the History of Pan-African Trade, Commerce, Money and Wealth, tells a reality of this.�
While many of Africans? ancestors were kidnapped in Africa, many were Africans who came from West Africa, had a number of kingdoms and empires in the Southern parts of the U.S., and who were captured, had their lands taken and their persons sold into slavery. These Africans were direct black ancestors and their had a continuing connection with West Africa which included trade and commerce on the very eve of the invasion of the Europeans to the Americas.�
In 1991, the U.S. returned about 68,000 square acres of land to the Wa****aw Nation of Louisiana, one of the prehistoric Black nations of the United States (See www.hotep.org). This group of Blacks is the evidence of the Black ownership of land and the Black presence before English and Spanish/French colonization of North America.�
Many Blacks living today are descended from the pre-Columbian Black nations and it is time that issue is included in the reparation discussion. They should locate who are the descendants of these pre-Columbian African nations in the U.S. (perhaps the entire mixed African-American population, since most of these Black tribes were enslaved and shipped to plantations and mixed with Blacks from Africa).
Its so weird hearing a white dude talk about this stuff. I guess its true what they say..they know who we are but we don't.