...So
formerly beyondmeasure
- 17,090
- 7,899
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2013
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I believe this less and less.the reason stuff like that doesn't happen is because young people are not a reliable voting bloc
so staying home just further decreases the chances of that ever happening.
I asked myself a similar question this evening, flashed back to my 2006-8, and said the secular equivalent of "not today, Satan."Ask yourself Osh, do your really want to spend your night arguing with Timid?
the reason stuff like that doesn't happen is because young people are not a reliable voting bloc
so staying home just further decreases the chances of that ever happening.
I will play the devil’s advocate and also argue it’s hard to message about the Republicans cheating because the ways they do it in back room deals and during boring committee votes. These are not nearly as interesting (and easy to go viral) as the lies they use to accuse Democrats of cheating. Gerrymandering that I still don’t think the majority of American citizens understand isn’t nearly as scandalous as making up a story that the Democrats are voting twice.How do you explain Medicare not being expanded to cover vision, hearing, and dental.
I agree that we need a lot more people voting, including young people, but it’s pretty obvious that voting patterns only get you so far. Older people vote and poorer senior citizens aren’t getting much help.
Money talks.
Obviously voting GOP will make things worse and like a total sucker I’m sure I’ll be donating to Democratic candidates in the 2022 cycle.
However, the mechanism by which minimal Democratic policy wins turn into electoral defeats tends to be “voting can’t change my material conditions, I am not going to miss a day’s pay at my low-wage, precarious job, in order to stave in line for eight hours to vote for politicians who won’t change things.”
Some voters flip from cycle to cycle but big swings from one election to another, in the sane geographic are, tend to be the result of different groups turning out.
How do you explain Medicare not being expanded to cover vision, hearing, and dental.
I agree that we need a lot more people voting, including young people, but it’s pretty obvious that voting patterns only get you so far. Older people vote and poorer senior citizens aren’t getting much help.
Money talks.
You make too many excuses for dudeobviously money is a factor but I think you consistently overrate it's impact on these things.
a senator is going to be rich for the rest of their life regardless of whatever vote or positions they take.
plus big democratic donors are to the left of rank and file dem voters
Warnock is breaking records fundraising wise.
it's not like the progressive non profit world is bereft of money.
if all it took was money to sway these people then im sure Geroge Soros could make it happen.
You underestimate the degree to which these people believe these things whole heartedly.
the Dems have 50 senators and thus are slaves to the idiosyncrasies of the furthest right senators.
now don't get me wrong Sinema seems like a bad actor/grifter, but she stands out because she seems unusually ideologically flexible.
most of them really believe dumb ****,
theres a whole long Vox article on Joe Manchin and his history in west Virginia politics.
I came away pretty convinced his weird, somewhat irrational and contradictory world view
is born of legit goofiness and not because xyz corporation is bribing him.
You make too many excuses for dude
Yes he is goofy and loves the attention
But lobbyists openly brag about having his ear and him being an ally
Probably directly benefits from his energy company
Dude openly says incoherent nonsense to defend his positions too. Like clearly dumb **** that makes little logical sense
Mans can be a goofball and bought at the same time
maybe i am but imo non of his behavior requires corruption
I have no doubt that Joe Manchin thinks of himself as a pro business conservative democrat
. and he's a glad-handing old school politician,
so id bet he thinks that talking to billionaires and listening to their concerns is good for the country.
you don't need to bribery to find a west Virginia man that has an irrational commitment to coal mining.
people having irrational commitments to local extractive industries does not necessitate corruption.
ultimately my point is for rex everything comes down to money
and regardless of where you come down on Joe Manchins level of corruption, I just don't think it's really that simple.
Or at least a lazy link drop to spike the ball.
It’s both sad and predictable.
Always bet on shamelessness.Delk comes in the thread 4 hours late to troll just because he couldn't help himself
I wouldn't say it's all about money but the conventional wisdom, that groups, who vote a lot, get their problems solved, is off the mark. There's a lot of senior citizens living in poverty and that is a bloc that votes a lot.
Related to that, Joe Manchin is going to bat for billionaires despite not a single billionaire living in West Virginia. It's hard to chalk it up to local eccentricities under those conditions.