I think
Thinking "outside the box" does not give your any more credence than anyone else. I read enough National Review and American Conservative to know the fiffdiffer between an weak argument and one I simply disagree with.
And famb, your argument is filmsy.
There is so many things I pick apart in your argument but instead let me point out how Trump himself undermines your argument. Most obvious is that our damn entire ibtel intelligence community agrees Russian meddled in your elections. And it was clearly to help Trump.
If Trump is really innocent and did nothing wrong then he should welcome investigations into Russia and his campaign. If innocent, Comey would have exonerated him. That would have been a huge politicial win for him. Even after firing Comey he could be welcoming to Mueller. Instead he is extremely hostile and seemingly tries to undercut the entire thing. His behavior borders on obstruction
Second if he did break the law, invoking lack of experience, or that "billionaires do business with foreign entities" is not a valid excuse. If he is so inexperienced to the point of incompetency and if he did do something unethical besides conspire to win an election then those things still should disqualify him from being president.
If it not the posiblity of conspiracy that troubles you, Then the possible obstruction, graft, possible financial crime should.
It seems you are too caught up on making your argument should different, you didn't think whether or not is easy cogent.
And with all due respect, it is not.
Thanks im just trying to have a discussion not with gifs and laughing emojis... We are all entitled to our opinions so no respect needed because i didnt even take offense.
Im not saying my opinion is worth any more than anyone else in this thread tho.
They say russia meddled because they cant prove %100 what they did to help win Trump presidency what exactly does "MEDDLED" mean?
Russia didnt rig the election in my opinion. Its so easy to draw up conspiracies that align with what you think happen is what i trying to show. Go read Mueller 37 page indictment on the so called "MEDDLING" if you havent.
Russia ran trumps campaign in support of what trump was campaigning in his run. Trump ran on bigotry and thats what America is full of bigots. Trump would of won that campaign without Russia help in my opinion Obama being in office for 8 years had the bigots come out in full force in 2016 and us folks who supported Obama some were held back by voter suppression gerrymandering etc..
Trump owns real estate and business in Russia which is conflict of interest. But in my opinion he handled his campaign as a business and now its coming to bite him in the ****. Its so easy to point the finger at the "kremlin" and draw up all these conspiracies that can get trump thrown out for conflicts of interest.
If you havent watch Putin speech after him securing the presidency for another 6 years even tho he has all these "accusations" and "meddlings" and voting rigs they turned out in full support of him but im sure you can find an article that aligns with your views that say it was "rigged" so lets just think if he did truly win it.
All im doing is looking at it from a different stance if Trump really is telling the truth that there is no collusion than what was up with him calling stake in jerusalem with a war that has been going on for hundreds of years? Trump isnt smart enough to understand immigration so i doubt he understands the middle east history, im sure the jewish people probably paid him to call stake in jerusalem he is all about himself
is it outlandish to think that is possible?
I think if we really keep this probe up we going to over turn rocks that we shouldnt have, and when thinking about whats under those rocks is the conspiracies i posted just drawing up scenarios.
Im not in hear to say who is right or who is wrong but that alot of you think just the same and try thinking of all the other scenarios if you are wrong is all im trying to show..
Peace.
@ Thinking outside the box for a change.
