- 16,310
- 129
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2007
She's cuter live.Originally Posted by Lightweight Champion
Hmm, good enough to DVR morning news at 7. Idk about waking up though
Official Sacramento Kings Off-season Thread
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by mister916,
- Start date
- 16,310
- 129
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2007
She's cuter live.Originally Posted by Lightweight Champion
Hmm, good enough to DVR morning news at 7. Idk about waking up though
D
Deleted member 38182
Guest
Hmmmm Sacto Kings NT Summit
D
Deleted member 38182
Guest
Hmmmm Sacto Kings NT Summit
- 5,456
- 11
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2008
Why don't we actually go to a Kings game instead? Lol.
- 5,456
- 11
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2008
Why don't we actually go to a Kings game instead? Lol.
D
Deleted member 38182
Guest
Because this report is apparently whack
PM me yall, lets figure out where this Crandell clown lives....
"Report: Plan to keep Kings in Sacto 'laughable'"
Posted on: March 24, 2011 4:26 pm
Posted by Royce Young
Earlier, there was a story out with a reported new plan to keep the Kings home in Sacramento. There weren't any specifics, just the word that the the money was "in place" to keep the team in California's capital city.
Except that report might not be right. According to Marc Spears of Yahoo! Sports on Twitter, a source found the television report "laughable" and called the chances of the team staying "remote."
Darn. Not good.
All signs point to the Kings exiting Sacramento unless something drastic happens. The earlier report was encouraging, but with the way it sounds now, it's back to the drawing board. Money is at the heart of the issue, so if there was a way to come up with funding, it certainly would change things. But that might not be the case anymore. Which means someone else will have to step up.
http://matt-moore.blogs.c...816?source=rss_blogs_NBA
PM me yall, lets figure out where this Crandell clown lives....
"Report: Plan to keep Kings in Sacto 'laughable'"
Posted on: March 24, 2011 4:26 pm
Posted by Royce Young
Earlier, there was a story out with a reported new plan to keep the Kings home in Sacramento. There weren't any specifics, just the word that the the money was "in place" to keep the team in California's capital city.
Except that report might not be right. According to Marc Spears of Yahoo! Sports on Twitter, a source found the television report "laughable" and called the chances of the team staying "remote."
Darn. Not good.
All signs point to the Kings exiting Sacramento unless something drastic happens. The earlier report was encouraging, but with the way it sounds now, it's back to the drawing board. Money is at the heart of the issue, so if there was a way to come up with funding, it certainly would change things. But that might not be the case anymore. Which means someone else will have to step up.
http://matt-moore.blogs.c...816?source=rss_blogs_NBA
D
Deleted member 38182
Guest
Because this report is apparently whack
PM me yall, lets figure out where this Crandell clown lives....
"Report: Plan to keep Kings in Sacto 'laughable'"
Posted on: March 24, 2011 4:26 pm
Posted by Royce Young
Earlier, there was a story out with a reported new plan to keep the Kings home in Sacramento. There weren't any specifics, just the word that the the money was "in place" to keep the team in California's capital city.
Except that report might not be right. According to Marc Spears of Yahoo! Sports on Twitter, a source found the television report "laughable" and called the chances of the team staying "remote."
Darn. Not good.
All signs point to the Kings exiting Sacramento unless something drastic happens. The earlier report was encouraging, but with the way it sounds now, it's back to the drawing board. Money is at the heart of the issue, so if there was a way to come up with funding, it certainly would change things. But that might not be the case anymore. Which means someone else will have to step up.
http://matt-moore.blogs.c...816?source=rss_blogs_NBA
PM me yall, lets figure out where this Crandell clown lives....
"Report: Plan to keep Kings in Sacto 'laughable'"
Posted on: March 24, 2011 4:26 pm
Posted by Royce Young
Earlier, there was a story out with a reported new plan to keep the Kings home in Sacramento. There weren't any specifics, just the word that the the money was "in place" to keep the team in California's capital city.
Except that report might not be right. According to Marc Spears of Yahoo! Sports on Twitter, a source found the television report "laughable" and called the chances of the team staying "remote."
Darn. Not good.
All signs point to the Kings exiting Sacramento unless something drastic happens. The earlier report was encouraging, but with the way it sounds now, it's back to the drawing board. Money is at the heart of the issue, so if there was a way to come up with funding, it certainly would change things. But that might not be the case anymore. Which means someone else will have to step up.
http://matt-moore.blogs.c...816?source=rss_blogs_NBA
- 16,310
- 129
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2007
The dagger!
- 16,310
- 129
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2007
The dagger!
- 291
- 10
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2004
He never even mentioned why the report was laughable. Seems to me like it was just his opinion with no logic or reasoning.Originally Posted by rck2sactown
Because this report is apparently whack
PM me yall, lets figure out where this Crandell clown lives....
"Report: Plan to keep Kings in Sacto 'laughable'"
Posted on: March 24, 2011 4:26 pm
Posted by Royce Young
Earlier, there was a story out with a reported new plan to keep the Kings home in Sacramento. There weren't any specifics, just the word that the the money was "in place" to keep the team in California's capital city.
Except that report might not be right. According to Marc Spears of Yahoo! Sports on Twitter, a source found the television report "laughable" and called the chances of the team staying "remote."
Darn. Not good.
All signs point to the Kings exiting Sacramento unless something drastic happens. The earlier report was encouraging, but with the way it sounds now, it's back to the drawing board. Money is at the heart of the issue, so if there was a way to come up with funding, it certainly would change things. But that might not be the case anymore. Which means someone else will have to step up.
http://matt-moore.blogs.c...816?source=rss_blogs_NBA
- 291
- 10
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2004
He never even mentioned why the report was laughable. Seems to me like it was just his opinion with no logic or reasoning.Originally Posted by rck2sactown
Because this report is apparently whack
PM me yall, lets figure out where this Crandell clown lives....
"Report: Plan to keep Kings in Sacto 'laughable'"
Posted on: March 24, 2011 4:26 pm
Posted by Royce Young
Earlier, there was a story out with a reported new plan to keep the Kings home in Sacramento. There weren't any specifics, just the word that the the money was "in place" to keep the team in California's capital city.
Except that report might not be right. According to Marc Spears of Yahoo! Sports on Twitter, a source found the television report "laughable" and called the chances of the team staying "remote."
Darn. Not good.
All signs point to the Kings exiting Sacramento unless something drastic happens. The earlier report was encouraging, but with the way it sounds now, it's back to the drawing board. Money is at the heart of the issue, so if there was a way to come up with funding, it certainly would change things. But that might not be the case anymore. Which means someone else will have to step up.
http://matt-moore.blogs.c...816?source=rss_blogs_NBA
D
Deleted member 38182
Guest
^My guess is that Marc Spears heard of this plan a while ago, and never even bothered reporting it because it was so out there..... Now that we are in the 11th hour, the dude from Fox 40 got a wiff of this plan and decided to throw this out there cuz it would be a nice story that offers a glimmer of hope.
D
Deleted member 38182
Guest
^My guess is that Marc Spears heard of this plan a while ago, and never even bothered reporting it because it was so out there..... Now that we are in the 11th hour, the dude from Fox 40 got a wiff of this plan and decided to throw this out there cuz it would be a nice story that offers a glimmer of hope.
- 5,456
- 11
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2008
We will see. Marc Spears is usually credible, but not sure why dude would even care about the Kings anyways. He got bigger things to report.
- 5,456
- 11
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2008
We will see. Marc Spears is usually credible, but not sure why dude would even care about the Kings anyways. He got bigger things to report.
D
Deleted member 38182
Guest
Exactly what I mean. He probably heard of this plan a long time ago. Realized it was nothing big/real/legit to report, kept it moving.... and then noticed Crandell picking up on this; and then decided to shoot it down with the quickness.
D
Deleted member 38182
Guest
Exactly what I mean. He probably heard of this plan a long time ago. Realized it was nothing big/real/legit to report, kept it moving.... and then noticed Crandell picking up on this; and then decided to shoot it down with the quickness.
J
jawnstockton
Guest
Jimmy Crandell's looking to make Marc Spears his Crybaby of The Week
Spears isn't about that Sactown "all we report is murder and the weather for an hour" life.
Really though, I almost see this as a good thing. These "national" writers get salty when a podunk guy like Crandell scoops them. I think they wouldnt say a thing if there was zero validity to the story.
WHERE IS DEL RODGERS WHEN WE NEED HIM?
Spears isn't about that Sactown "all we report is murder and the weather for an hour" life.
Really though, I almost see this as a good thing. These "national" writers get salty when a podunk guy like Crandell scoops them. I think they wouldnt say a thing if there was zero validity to the story.
WHERE IS DEL RODGERS WHEN WE NEED HIM?
J
jawnstockton
Guest
Jimmy Crandell's looking to make Marc Spears his Crybaby of The Week
Spears isn't about that Sactown "all we report is murder and the weather for an hour" life.
Really though, I almost see this as a good thing. These "national" writers get salty when a podunk guy like Crandell scoops them. I think they wouldnt say a thing if there was zero validity to the story.
WHERE IS DEL RODGERS WHEN WE NEED HIM?
Spears isn't about that Sactown "all we report is murder and the weather for an hour" life.
Really though, I almost see this as a good thing. These "national" writers get salty when a podunk guy like Crandell scoops them. I think they wouldnt say a thing if there was zero validity to the story.
WHERE IS DEL RODGERS WHEN WE NEED HIM?
D
Deleted member 38182
Guest
^I will holler at him for ya!!! My pops knows him somewhat and we are in his March Madness pool every year
D
Deleted member 38182
Guest
^I will holler at him for ya!!! My pops knows him somewhat and we are in his March Madness pool every year
- 5,456
- 11
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2008
What happened to Sam Amick? He went national after leaving the Bee, but now I never see his reporting on the Kings.
- 5,456
- 11
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2008
What happened to Sam Amick? He went national after leaving the Bee, but now I never see his reporting on the Kings.
J
jawnstockton
Guest
Originally Posted by rck2sactown
^I will holler at him for ya!!! My pops knows him somewhat and we are in his March Madness pool every year
It's tough times for local sportscasters. I swear they really do spend about 30 mins on the weather every day. KCRA has like 5 meteorologists
Amick is doing NBA Confidential...still talks Kings, just not exclusively Kings. I follow him on Twitter.
