- 7,363
- 28,986
- Joined
- Dec 8, 1999
You explain it without sounding racist. I'm listening.@Methodical Management
13% of the population is black and that 13% accounts for 50% of the crime.
Explain that.
This is a professional issue about polive officers and how they handle themselves. It's not a race issue.
Is the prison industrial complex a race issue? Yes. More blacks get arrested and get higher sentencing for the same crimes? Yes. I 100% agree on that.
But there simply isnt enough evidence that blacks are being targeted by cops to murder them.
http://www.timwise.org/2013/08/race...right-manipulates-white-fear-with-bogus-data/More than HALF of all prisoners currently serving federal sentences of one year or longer were convicted of drug offenses.
According to the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (2000), White teenagers are over 33% more likely to have sold illegal drugs than their Black counterparts.
Usage rates for marijuana are approximately the same regardless of race. However, according to this same survey, White students are SEVEN TIMES more likely to use cocaine and heroin. Before you say "well, that's just self-report survey data," bear in mind that White youth visit hospital emergency rooms due to illegal drug use three times more than Black youth.
Yet, despite this, THREE QUARTERS of those imprisoned for drug crimes are Black or Latino.
Someone influenced by racism in our society is more likely to consider a Black man "dangerous" or "scary." That doesn't require a grand conspiracy to exterminate people of color. It just requires subconscious prejudice to influence one's perception of a threat.* Only about 1 percent of African Americans — and no more than 2 percent of black males — will commit a violent crime in a given year;
* Even though there are more black-on-white interracial crimes than white-on-black interracial crimes, this fact is not evidence of anti-white racial targeting by black offenders. Rather, it is completely explained by two factors having nothing to do with anti-white bias: namely, the general differences in rates of criminal offending, and the rates at which whites and blacks encounter one another (and thus, have the opportunity to victimize one another). Once these two factors are “controlled for” in social science terms, the actual rates of black-on-white crime are lower than random chance would predict;
* No more than 0.7 percent (seven-tenths of one percent) of African Americans will commit a violent crime against a white person in a given year, and fewer than 0.3 (three-tenths of one percent) of whites will be victimized by a black person in a given year;
* Whites are 6 times as likely to be murdered by another white person as by a black person; and overall, the percentage of white Americans who will be murdered by a black offender in a given year is only 2/10,000ths of 1 percent (0.0002). This means that only 1 in every 500,000 white people will be murdered by a black person in a given year. Although the numbers of black-on-white homicides are higher than the reverse (447 to 218 in 2010), the 218 black victims of white murderers is actually a higher percentage of the black population interracially killed than the 447 white victims of black murderers as a percentage of the white population. In fact, any given black person is 2.75 times as likely to be murdered by a white person as any given white person is to be murdered by an African American.
Most people are, by now, familiar with the biases exposed by Implicit Association Tests (https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/takeatest.html).
This is what happens when you take an IAT with a gun instead of a computer.