- 30,675
- 10,455
- Joined
- May 22, 2009
To become a good team you need good players.. Josh Jackson is the best player at #3
Last edited:
The NBA Draft Thread
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by pmatic,
- Start date
- 5,315
- 1,974
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2009
Embiid was a good 3 point shooter last year and I don't think they should make any decisions based off Simmons when he hasn't played an NBA minute. I still don't buy that he can be a primary ball handler legitimately. It's not like Philly is overloaded with athletic 2 way wings anyway.
- 80,694
- 55,639
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2012
Trading ratsull just doesn't make sense imo if you're gonna depend exclusively on ball to run the offense
Ball has never really ran p n r and isn't adept at dribble penetration. Ratsull is already pretty nice at least in the p n r
They suit each other very well offensively. Defensively it's going to be a challenge
Last edited:
- 61,079
- 132,109
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2003
True too but Josh shooting 55% from the foul line is alarming.
- 72,093
- 115,441
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2011
I agree with that. I just think that he's too good in most other facets of the game for a team like Sixers to pass up in order to take a guy that really only fills one need.
MVP
Supporter
- 82,774
- 84,983
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2008
Ratsull isn't actually that good in pick n roll situations.
- 80,694
- 55,639
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2012
Last edited:
MVP
Supporter
- 82,774
- 84,983
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2008
Nah I won't cause we gone be running and gunning. I think Ratsull gets moved this summer anyway.
- 44,704
- 66,394
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2001
If there's one thing I noticed that separates real gms from internet gms it's that real gms understand nothing is guaranteed with these rookies. You don't trade a young player on an upward trend just because you drafted the next young, unproven player. Especially one with similar flaws who won't be at the incumbent player's level for another 3 years. That's kinda dumb. It's like how everyone wanted the wolves to trade Rubio as soon as they drafted Kris Dunn. I highly doubt dlo gets traded
Last edited:
- 80,694
- 55,639
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2012
Half court offense gonna suffer if you trade ratsull away. Not that it was exceptional last season but yeah, depending on who you can get for ratsull, ball and clarkson is decent I guess
Last edited:
- 55,080
- 145,797
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2012
Lonzo getting the "D'loyalist" in a tizzy is the only positive thing about this though 
.
I almost feel like
BIG LEEMELONE
was hoping the lakers DIDN'T keep the pick this year.
.I almost feel like
BIG LEEMELONE
was hoping the lakers DIDN'T keep the pick this year.
MVP
Supporter
- 82,774
- 84,983
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2008
Lonzo getting the "D'loyalist" in a tizzy is the only positive thing about this though
I almost feel like
Oh he definitely didn't mind if we lost it at all. And you got the other D'Lo stans in panic mode as well.
- 33,347
- 15,147
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2009
Ehhh best believe the Wolves would have traded Rubio if the right package came along. They were definitely exploring trades for him. As far as Russell goes though I don't think they should trade him. He's the one piece on their team that has legitimately shown promise and not just flashes. I don't know who you'd trade him for that would be a better fit honestly. He's a good shooter and Lonzo will need guys like that on the wings.
- 44,704
- 66,394
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2001
I think lonzo will be solid but if he is it'll be because he's not the #1 guy. He's a ball mover moreso than a playmaker. I mean dlo was just as good if not a better prospect than lonzo coming out and he's had his fair share of struggles. So to expect lonzo to come in and light it up is rather idiotic. You're throwing away 3 years of development for what? Paul 'ball game' George? And expecting a team led by pg and ball to take you where exactly? Doesn't add up
Last edited:
- 72,093
- 115,441
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2011
DLo is a better player than Ball.
MVP
Supporter
- 82,774
- 84,983
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2008
Ratsull for #3 who says no?
- 30,675
- 10,455
- Joined
- May 22, 2009
The Lakers would say no
MVP
Supporter
- 82,774
- 84,983
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2008
The Lakers would say no
Why?
- 81,768
- 116,204
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2010
Jackson's shooting will improve. The kid will be fine, his ceiling is too high to pass up.
- 28,226
- 3,086
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2009
Man listen, id do that trade if I'm philly in a heartbeat. Russell on the Sixers would actually be perfect
- 20,983
- 31,022
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2016
For sure. Solidly.
I don't get the lakers fans infatuation with moving their clear best player who's 21 years old
he was pretty good last year and took a solid jump I'm not too high on Ball so to move D'Lo in favor of letting Lonzo run the offense is pretty idiotic and you're asking for a train wreck. Paul George not coming to a team led by lonzo ball A
- 30,675
- 10,455
- Joined
- May 22, 2009
Not sure if srsThe Lakers would say no
Why?
- 20,983
- 31,022
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2016
Lakers in a heartbeat
- 81,768
- 116,204
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2010
Lonzo getting the "D'loyalist" in a tizzy is the only positive thing about this though
I almost feel like
My man tryna find any negatively.
I'm looking forward to them working well together.
- 4,616
- 1,404
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2012
trading russell right before he breaks out....sounds like something the lakeshow would do
Similar threads
