- 30,675
- 10,455
- Joined
- May 22, 2009
To become a good team you need good players.. Josh Jackson is the best player at #3
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Trading ratsull just doesn't make sense imo if you're gonna depend exclusively on ball to run the offenseHow would a Russell/Ball pairing work? Wouldn't that pairing be food defensively? What about shot creation? Would it make sense to dangle Russell in a trade or not draft Ball to fill another need? Just trying to think of their options at #2.
I honestly don't see why he can't be an average, 35-36% 3 point shooter. Jimmy Butler has been an all-star for the past 3 seasons while shooting 35% from 3 during that span.I'd drink the kool aid if Josh was a better shooter. I can't imagine good floor spacing with Simmons, embiid and josh
I agree with that. I just think that he's too good in most other facets of the game for a team like Sixers to pass up in order to take a guy that really only fills one need.True too but Josh shooting 55% from the foul line is alarming.
Trading ratsull just doesn't make sense imo if you're gonna depend exclusively on ball to run the offense
Ball has never really ran p n r and isn't adept at dribble penetration. Ratsull is already pretty nice at least in the p n r
They suit each other very well offensively. Defensively it's going to be a challenge
Then you're gonna hate ball in the p n rRatsull isn't actually that good in pick n roll situations.
Then you're gonna hate ball in the p n r
Half court offense gonna suffer if you trade ratsull away. Not that it was exceptional last season but yeah, depending on who you can get for ratsull, ball and clarkson is decent I guessNah I won't cause we gone be running and gunning. I think Ratsull gets moved this summer anyway.
Lonzo getting the "D'loyalist" in a tizzy is the only positive thing about this though.
I almost feel likeBIG LEEMELONE was hoping the lakers DIDN'T keep the pick this year.
If there's one thing I noticed that separates real gms from internet gms it's that real gms understand nothing is guaranteed with these rookies. You don't trade a young player on an upward trend just because you drafted the next young, unproven player. Especially one with similar flaws who won't be at the incumbent player's level for another 3 years. That's kinda dumb. It's like how everyone wanted the wolves to trade Rubio as soon as they drafted Kris Dunn. I highly doubt dlo gets traded
The Lakers would say no![]()
I agree with that. I just think that he's too good in most other facets of the game for a team like Sixers to pass up in order to take a guy that really only fills one need.True too but Josh shooting 55% from the foul line is alarming.
Ratsull for #3 who says no?
DLo is a better player than Ball.
Not sure if srsThe Lakers would say no![]()
Why?
Ratsull for #3 who says no?
Lonzo getting the "D'loyalist" in a tizzy is the only positive thing about this though.
I almost feel likeBIG LEEMELONE was hoping the lakers DIDN'T keep the pick this year.