- 6,247
- 18
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2009
so now Mizzou, Clemson along with FSU rumored to Join?
these 16 team conferences just seems like overkill to me.
these 16 team conferences just seems like overkill to me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by BostonThreeParty
so now Mizzou, Clemson along with FSU rumored to Join?
these 16 team conferences just seems like overkill to me.
Originally Posted by BostonThreeParty
so now Mizzou, Clemson along with FSU rumored to Join?
these 16 team conferences just seems like overkill to me.
Originally Posted by Caerus
Why would FSU leave the ACC though? I'm being serious, whats the main benefit? I mean, they can dominate the ACC again (I see another dynasty brewing again) but by going to the SEC, the competition is much more competitive than the ACC.
Just wondering why they would go the sec..more money I'm guessing?
Originally Posted by Caerus
Why would FSU leave the ACC though? I'm being serious, whats the main benefit? I mean, they can dominate the ACC again (I see another dynasty brewing again) but by going to the SEC, the competition is much more competitive than the ACC.
Just wondering why they would go the sec..more money I'm guessing?
Originally Posted by GUNNA GET IT
actually FSU brings the ALot
Originally Posted by GUNNA GET IT
actually FSU brings the ALot
darrenrovell darren rovell
Even though it adds another TV market, I think the Pac-10 adding Utah & Colorado was a mistake from a $ standpoint
darrenrovell darren rovell
Tradition & strength of team are just as important as TV market in $ game. Nebraska doesn't make sense in Big 10 as a TV market.
MicheleSteele Michele Steele
The SEC has strong incentive to add teams -- its CBS contract is considered belowmarket for what should be richest deal in cfb
and Im not sure about the other 3 teams being set in stone
there were plenty reports saying the SEC would be willign to keep the one addition and stick them in the west.
darrenrovell darren rovell
Even though it adds another TV market, I think the Pac-10 adding Utah & Colorado was a mistake from a $ standpoint
darrenrovell darren rovell
Tradition & strength of team are just as important as TV market in $ game. Nebraska doesn't make sense in Big 10 as a TV market.
MicheleSteele Michele Steele
The SEC has strong incentive to add teams -- its CBS contract is considered belowmarket for what should be richest deal in cfb
and Im not sure about the other 3 teams being set in stone
there were plenty reports saying the SEC would be willign to keep the one addition and stick them in the west.
Originally Posted by GUNNA GET IT
Tradition & strength of
team are just as important as TV market in $ game. Nebraska doesn't make
sense in Big 10 as a TV market.
Originally Posted by GUNNA GET IT
Tradition & strength of
team are just as important as TV market in $ game. Nebraska doesn't make
sense in Big 10 as a TV market.