- May 14, 2013
- 14,870
- 20,648
Also think that it’s ironic Money and finances are often sited as a major reason for divorce, but the low rates of marriage under the poverty line are looked at as one of the primary causes for poverty to begin with
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Has anyone claimed there is a mass firing of black people?
Or have people been telling you over and over that data shows racial discrimination in hiring and pay in the job market followed by data and studies to support it?
You’re chasing ghost arguments no one is making.
Who the hell puts sugar on grits
da real question is if a person doesn't feel it, you expect em to believe it? or care for that matter?
that's why its perilous to treat an entire group as a monolith, cuz a trend ≠ a absolute.
if u put put syrup its essentially da same thing..
Meth is a white man with a black wifeHmmm so I guess we’re still gonna let bigoted thought ride on this forum as long as it’s targeted toward Blacks. This forum is such a shining example of the fairness and equality that it’s leader pretends to practice. But let me make a comment about whites or Asians and my post is swiftly deleted and meth is in my inbox
does da black community accept ANY black conservative/republican as a member their own without resorting to uncle this, and biscuit that?
Modern day I'm not really familiar with any tbh.
Thread needs more unity
Neither view point wants to meet in the middle which is the issue in America. “Us vs them”
Obama did this for 8 years and then they chose Trump as their candidate. Also define what you see the opposing view points I’d be curious. To me, their viewpoint of a country gone astray because immigrants stole white peoples jobs and blacks won’t stop complaining even though they are just inherently lazy/criminal is something I just can’t reason with.
Strawman. You're trying to distort the argument into a non-existant and absurd argument.Anecdotes is what all this **** is based on! Individual accounts! There is no mass firing of black people.
- In 2002, New Yorkers were stopped by the police 97,296 times.
80,176 were totally innocent (82 percent).- In 2003, New Yorkers were stopped by the police 160,851 times.
140,442 were totally innocent (87 percent).
77,704 were black (54 percent).
44,581 were Latino (31 percent).
17,623 were white (12 percent).
83,499 were aged 14-24 (55 percent).- Total % of black and latino stops: 85%
- In 2004, New Yorkers were stopped by the police 313,523 times.
278,933 were totally innocent (89 percent).
155,033 were black (55 percent).
89,937 were Latino (32 percent).
28,913 were white (10 percent).
152,196 were aged 14-24 (52 percent).- Total % of black and latino stops: 87%
- In 2005, New Yorkers were stopped by the police 398,191 times.
352,348 were totally innocent (89 percent).
196,570 were black (54 percent).
115,088 were Latino (32 percent).
40,713 were white (11 percent).
189,854 were aged 14-24 (51 percent).- Total % of black and latino stops: 86%
- In 2006, New Yorkers were stopped by the police 506,491 times.
457,163 were totally innocent (90 percent).
267,468 were black (53 percent).
147,862 were Latino (29 percent).
53,500 were white (11 percent).
247,691 were aged 14-24 (50 percent).- Total % of black and latino stops: 82%
- In 2007, New Yorkers were stopped by the police 472,096 times.
410,936 were totally innocent (87 percent).
243,766 were black (54 percent).
141,868 were Latino (31 percent).
52,887 were white (12 percent).
223,783 were aged 14-24 (48 percent).- Total % of black and latino stops: 85%
- In 2008, New Yorkers were stopped by the police 540,302 times.
474,387 were totally innocent (88 percent).
275,588 were black (53 percent).
168,475 were Latino (32 percent).
57,650 were white (11 percent).
263,408 were aged 14-24 (49 percent).- Total % of black and latino stops: 85%
- In 2009, New Yorkers were stopped by the police 581,168 times.
510,742 were totally innocent (88 percent).
310,611 were black (55 percent).
180,055 were Latino (32 percent).
53,601 were white (10 percent).
289,602 were aged 14-24 (50 percent).- Total % of black and latino stops: 87%
- In 2010, New Yorkers were stopped by the police 601,285 times.
518,849 were totally innocent (86 percent).
315,083 were black (54 percent).
189,326 were Latino (33 percent).
54,810 were white (9 percent).
295,902 were aged 14-24 (49 percent).- Total % of black and latino stops: 87%
- In 2011, New Yorkers were stopped by the police 685,724 times.
605,328 were totally innocent (88 percent).
350,743 were black (53 percent).
223,740 were Latino (34 percent).
61,805 were white (9 percent).
341,581 were aged 14-24 (51 percent).- Total % of black and latino stops: 87%
- In 2012, New Yorkers were stopped by the police 532,911 times
473,644 were totally innocent (89 percent).
284,229 were black (55 percent).
165,140 were Latino (32 percent).
50,366 were white (10 percent).- Total % of black and latino stops: 87%
Obama did this for 8 years
Yup that’s a part of some of the viewpoints on one side that I don’t agree with.
There are view points on the other side that lack accountability that i don’t agree with also.
To be honest, I’m exhausted from the topic as I’ve said all my opinions yesterday but in closing their has to be compromise on both sides. And Kanye about to drop a classic album
I think what's being suggested is that your worldview is incomplete. If you acknowledge that White privilege exists, it's not necessary to suggest that a White person's experiences are dishonest or irrelevant if they don't think they've ever experienced White privilege. White privilege is presented as the default or normative experience in America. We all know how the public institutions are intended to work. We all know how the police are supposed to interact with citizens, for example. If your experiences match the way things are supposed to be, why would that feel like privilege? If you're hired or given a loan, you won't be told that it's because of your race. You'll be told, or you'll assume, that you earned it. Privilege would be as conspicuous to you as the presence of water to a fish. Only in its absence would you notice it.
If we want to better understand society, we need to view it from as many different perspectives as possible. We can't understand society as a whole from any one perspective or vantage point. The goal, then, is to synthesize and make sense of the varied ways in which we all experience society.
It's like the parable of the blind men and the elephant.
If you've never experienced racism, that doesn't invalidate the experiences of those who have.
To put it more bluntly, in this case it's a bit like saying, "You must be imagining things. I've been kissing this elephant's backside my whole life and I've never seen anyone gored by a tusk." You wouldn't, from where you're standing.
You're saying that discrimination can't happen because it's illegal. All crimes are illegal. Does crime not exist?
If you made even the most basic effort to research incidences of employment discrimination, you could find more than one example. It's the epitome of privilege to sit back and say, "it's your responsibility to convince me of this discrimination of which you speak!"
If you truly value education, if you believe in holding informed viewpoints, it's incumbent upon you to make the effort. Employers can conjure up all manner of justifications to mask discriminatory behavior. "Wasn't a culture fit." "Had a bad attitude." A person need not be explicitly motivated by prejudice to behave in discriminatory ways. Subconscious biases are more than sufficient.
Nobody knows everything. I couldn't tell you the first thing about rugby, but I don't pretend otherwise and I have no reason to criticize a rugby player for their performance in a sport I couldn't care less about.
You're judging people based on uninformed assumptions regarding a subject you've made no serious effort to understand. It's ridiculous to say "nobody can show me proof that employment discrimination exists" when any computer-literate person could locate such evidence in under thirty seconds using the Internet.
https://www1.eeoc.gov//eeoc/initiatives/e-race/caselist.cfm?renderforprint=1
It seems you don't understand the distinction between relative and absolute percentages. It's perfectly reasonable to think, "of course more White people in America use drugs, because there are more White people in general." Black Americans make up about 12.7% of the population, an 12.5% of drug users, yet 29% of those arrested and 33% of those imprisoned for drug offenses are Black: http://www.naacp.org/criminal-justice-fact-sheet/
The 33% statistic you're referring to is a relative statistic. Think of a population survey group like a roulette wheel. On a typical roulette wheel, 47.36% of spaces are black and 47.36% of spaces are red. Even and odd numbers are equally distributed between red and black. If, instead, numbers were randomly assigned colors, there could be more of one color than another, and one color could have more even numbered spaces than odd numbered spaces.
Let's say that there are 12 black spaces and 24 red spaces. Two thirds of the black spaces are even-numbered. That means 8 black spaces would be evenly numbered and 10 red spaces would be evenly numbered. In our sample, then, 2:3 black spaces are even-numbered compared to 5:12 red spaces. A black space selected at random would thus be statistically more likely to be even-numbered than a red space, even though there are more red spaces than black spaces, and more evenly-numbered red spaces than evenly-numbered black spaces.
For a start, you're relying on anecdotal evidence - and anecdotal evidence that does not disprove in any way the presence of systemic racism, unless it were argued that no Black person, anywhere, ever, has succeeded by any measure in a racist society.
We know that wealth is unequally distributed in this society. https://www.forbes.com/sites/briant...americas-most-pressing-epidemic/#283185b17a48
Michael Jordan is a billionaire, yet since Michael Jordan began playing college basketball, the wealth of the median Black household declined by 75%. That's not ancient history. That's not slavery. That's 1983-2013. Over that same span, median White household wealth increased by 14%.
It's also essential to acknowledge that affluent people of color experience racism, too. If your advice to Black Americans is "pull up your pants, get an education, and get a good job," one would think that Dr. Henry Louis Gates would qualify. Yet, in 2009, Dr. Gates was arrested after a White neighbor accused him of breaking into his own home. So much for "respectability politics."
You're attempting to trivialize racism by comparing it to your brother's height advantage. I've never heard of anyone being lynched for dating someone of a different height.
Second, as has been pointed out to you, I would wager that the vast majority of those you're telling to "stop making excuses" have jobs and college degrees. Dikembe Mutombo often says, "When you take the elevator to the top, please remember to send it back down so someone else might use it." They spent most of their day working. You, by your own admission, spent the day walking on the beach.
While everyone deserves time off, it seems an ill moment to accuse others of laziness. For all you know, many of the people you're insulting have worked harder and generated a larger share of their own wealth than you have for yours. Meanwhile, you act as though they're suggesting that there's no point in trying to work hard because racism exists. As far as I'm aware, not a single person here has made that claim. Again, it's a strawman.
I think you'd find that most decent people would like to leave the world better than they found it. That's a virtue, not a sign of indolence.
Everyone here who gives a damn about racism and social inequality is striving to be the best they can be individually while simultaneously demonstrating concern for this society's most grievous injustices.
Can you honestly say the same when you've yet to perform even the most basic research on the matter?
If your interest in having this conversation represents a first step towards bettering yourself on that front, great, but, in the interest of personal responsibility, shouldn't you be the one making the effort to research it, rather than asking the rest of the community to lay all the evidence at your feet?
You weren't the only one who received a warning or had their post deleted. We want everyone to treat each other with respect. Posts containing insults, personal attacks, and profanity are against the rules.
I wish enforcement of these rules could be perfect, but we have a small team and we can't possibly read every single post added to the forums each day. We rely on our fellow community members to help us by reporting the violations they encounter. Some users report posts only when they are personally upset by them, which can project their inconsistencies on the staff. Please know that's not our intention. We do the best we can to be as evenhanded as possible given the resources available to us.
If you encounter a rule violation, you're encouraged to use the report link to bring it to the staff's attention.
The Wizards' perennial failures are best discussed in the Sports & Training forum.
While I understand that many people here would rather discuss Kanye West's latest plea for attention directly, a serious discussion of systemic racism is at least peripheral to his proclaimed support for Donald Trump and thus relates to the topic. The latest NBA playoff results are not.
Obama did this for 8 years and then they chose Trump as their candidate. Also define what you see the opposing view points I’d be curious. To me, their viewpoint of a country gone astray because immigrants stole white peoples jobs and blacks won’t stop complaining even though they are just inherently lazy/criminal is something I just can’t reason with.
You can't expect people to find middle ground with bad ideas and ********Thread needs more unity
Neither view point wants to meet in the middle which is the issue in America. “Us vs them”
So here in Miami I’m see American chains like Subways and Walmart’s that have no English speaking employees. They are not taking “white peoples jobs”, they are taking jobs from other minorities born here as well as teenagers who need to learn the value of working at a young age.
Whoever said blacks are inherently lazy/criminal is wrong for that.
they are taking jobs from other minorities born here as well as teenagers who need to learn the value of working at a young age