- 149,046
- 197,669
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2007
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Not everyone in the population can't afford the premiums/deductibles. Stripping healthcare away from everyone with no repeal in place is a better option how exactly?sounds like you don't want da answer.
you prefer to pretend to have insurance you can't afford cuz of premiums/deductables vs getting blocked off top?
Who had 8 years? Trump? The Senate?
I don't think the majority of conservatives feel this way. Bigots are bigots. They exist in every party.
You realize that even this potential situation is better than what the GOP has proposed?!?!
its Democrats fault if Obamacare ultimately fails under its own weight, its Republicans fault for not passing a repeal, if it gets to that point.So it's Democrats fault the Republicans currently can't find a good alternative to Obamacare?
You rather get shot twice? This is what the proposed GOP plan would be for the millions of people at risk of losing insurance.umm no its not better, its a band-aid on a bullet wound.
You rather get shot twice? This is what the proposed GOP plan would be for the millions of people at risk of losing insurance.
And btw that's terrible that you know that Obamacare is not perfect yet don't propose any meaningful legislation that would make the situation better.
da miniscule number of people affected by pre Obamacare passage could've been taken care of without overhauling 1/6th of da US economy.Anyway this was pre-ACA
http://www.charlotteobserver.com/opinion/editorials/article127783904.html
This does not sound better at ALL
George Clinton 2020.
umm no its not better, its a band-aid on a bullet wound.
its Democrats fault if Obamacare ultimately fails under its own weight, its Republicans fault for not passing a repeal, if it gets to that point.
First off the whole band aid on a bullet wound analogy is just signs that you dont understand what obama care did. It guaranteed healthcare for people who couldnt afford it and were denied it in the past. So now more people have healthcare than before. Is it perfect no. Could it use work, Yes. That is what Republicans and Dems should be working on. Repeal and Replace would have been worse which is why it didnt even go up for a vote. And Repeal only would have caused 32 million to lose their healthcare. If you think Dems are going to be blamed by those who trusted republicans to make healthcare in this country better and didnt by not coming through on their promises your not paying attention. Take peoples healthcare away or make it worse and I guarantee you they will blame the person who took it away and not the person who gave it to them in the first place. GOP is looking like a party in crisis when they have all of the power and cant get a major promise to their constituents done. The simple fact that our president is out here saying let 32 million people lose their healthcare by repeal bill is astonishing.i rather rip da band-aid off & start over.
Obamacare is finito, da political calculations that should be discussed is who's gonna take da L if da GOP can't repeal it. (hint...da dems looking bad for that)
da only GOP folks who's taking a L are folks who baulked at voting for a clean repeal after da identical bill was voted on in 2015 (primary road kill in da midterms.)
Democrats only win card is them allowing da GOP to tinker with healthcare and hope it screws up on their watch after their fingerprints are on it.
as is right now, GOP still on offense, but they need to complete a pass in da red zone, not fumble on da 1 yard line.
Dude probably has ACA and doesnt even know it like many Trump voters.Ninja do you have health insurance? I'm fully not expecting an answer, just want to see where this goes.
Ninja do you have health insurance? .
Is it ACA?uhh i have a job, full coverage.
How can you talk about ripping the band aid off and starting over on something that doesn't even affect you?
you do know that coverage through employers can still be ACA right? Many people dont understand this and dont know they have it.it doesn't effect da vaaaaast majority of Americans because da majority get their insurance thru their employer.
Obamacare da way its stands now WILL start to effect people who already have insurance thru their employer because of certain taxes, regulations, and insurance companies dropping coverage will leave people to depend on exchanges that don't even exist in some states.
nope, private insurance (Aetna)Is it ACA?
That can still be ACA bruhnope, private insurance (Aetna)
it doesn't effect da vaaaaast majority of Americans because da majority get their insurance thru their employer.
Obamacare da way its stands now WILL start to effect people who already have insurance thru their employer because of certain taxes, regulations, and insurance companies dropping coverage will leave people to depend on exchanges that don't even exist in some states.
Do you understand that healthcare isn't that easy to fix and takes time? What you're proposing would be a disaster of epic proportions if you don't have a set system. Starting from scratch with a "free market" would be a huge loss for people of low and middle income, sick, and elderly and even for insurers since they would need to recalibrate costs of preparing for potentially changing legislation. Thank god you're not an actual policy maker.i rather rip da band-aid off & start over.