- 54,643
- 144,427
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2012
***Official Political Discussion Thread***
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by rico x hood,
- Start date
- 147,727
- 195,133
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2007
- 54,643
- 144,427
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2012
- 147,727
- 195,133
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2007
- 18,369
- 33,967
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2004
seeing all these MAGAs at the rally today:
- 14,339
- 34,579
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2011
kdawg
Staff member
- 10,624
- 11,758
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2003
She is awful - but she was permabanned from Twitter yesterday so at least there’s that.
storm2006
Supporter
- 29,035
- 64,028
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2001
Last edited:
RustyShackleford
Supporter
- 63,819
- 191,404
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2009
aepps20
Supporter
- 41,095
- 86,791
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2004
aepps20
Supporter
- 41,095
- 86,791
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2004
After this Tulsa, rally you might not want to talk about what Trump’s done today
He is letting Libs have with it which it was I voted for.
elpablo21
Supporter
- 103,683
- 186,341
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2008
Rona in the cut
- 147,727
- 195,133
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2007
“The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”
Rona in the cut
Is Pence gonna be at this **** too?
- 17,653
- 42,822
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2017
‘Rona needs to snipe Trump ASAP
- 17,653
- 42,822
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2017
storm2006
Supporter
- 29,035
- 64,028
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2001
Rona in the cut
We need both Trump and Pence to get it because then Speaker of The House becomes POTUS meaning Nancy takes over until November
I’m also unsure what that would mean for the Republican nominee for the 2020 Election
elpablo21
Supporter
- 103,683
- 186,341
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2008
Thugs running rampant today
Belgium
formerly colombia
- 26,254
- 37,588
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2013
Conveniently no mention of Barr stating yesterday that he appointed Carpenito as U.S. Attorney under 28 USC § 541(a).
- 147,727
- 195,133
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2007
- 29,753
- 39,563
- Joined
- May 25, 2004
Rona is all worth it if it wipes them off the map.
why do you guys call him “delk”? Is delk short for winning or something?
why do you guys call him “delk”? Is delk short for winning or something?
aepps20
Supporter
- 41,095
- 86,791
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2004
Delk is synonymous with clowns
with no moral compasses so that's why I started to call him Delk. Plus auto correct on my phone kept replacing his username with Delk.
- 32,719
- 25,943
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2015
Amazing the moves innocent people make ammirite
Belgium
formerly colombia
- 26,254
- 37,588
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2013
Something is definitely very fishy about the removal of the SDNY US Attorney. Barr first tried to offer him other positions but Berman declined to take the bait.
Barr did the same thing with the D.C. US Attorney. He offered Liu a position at Treasury to replace her with a loyalist (Timothy Shea) and then Trump revoked Liu's nomination to that position. Given the extent Barr has gone to in order to remove Berman, I assume he tried to apply this tactic to Berman as well but it failed.
Berman's statement yesterday implied pretty strongly that he thought his attempted removal had to do with the investigations he was running. He specifically emphasized that those investigations "will continue without delay or interruption"and that he will ensure SDNY's "important cases continue unimpeded."
Berman was already going to be invited to testify at Wednesday's hearing in the House on DOJ politicization. One of Mueller's top prosecutors, who also worked on the Stone case in D.C., already confirmed his testimony. Given that Barr now got the president to get rid of Berman, maybe he has a story to tell Congress.
I also expect some leaks coming from SDNY in the next few days/weeks.
Barr did the same thing with the D.C. US Attorney. He offered Liu a position at Treasury to replace her with a loyalist (Timothy Shea) and then Trump revoked Liu's nomination to that position. Given the extent Barr has gone to in order to remove Berman, I assume he tried to apply this tactic to Berman as well but it failed.
Berman's statement yesterday implied pretty strongly that he thought his attempted removal had to do with the investigations he was running. He specifically emphasized that those investigations "will continue without delay or interruption"and that he will ensure SDNY's "important cases continue unimpeded."
Berman was already going to be invited to testify at Wednesday's hearing in the House on DOJ politicization. One of Mueller's top prosecutors, who also worked on the Stone case in D.C., already confirmed his testimony. Given that Barr now got the president to get rid of Berman, maybe he has a story to tell Congress.
I also expect some leaks coming from SDNY in the next few days/weeks.
