This isnt even high horse stuff. You cant come in here and start throwing around non-sense and get defensive when things are being questioned.
Is stretching the lower back dangerous? Is a massage dangerous? Is yoga dangerous?
All I'm saying is that the only time you come in here to post is to try and correct someone with your sports medicine background or whatever it is. It's always condescending. I just call it like I see it. I know other people in this thread feel that way, I'm just gonna call you out on it. I don't like you. Period.
And you're reaaachinnng with your examples. I have a fragile back so I have muscle disease?
And foam rolling is the same as stretching, massaging and yoga? COMPLETELY different things. But as long as you use extreme cases to help make you look better, go ahead. The entire point is that foam rolling applies a force in a singular direction on your spine that can't really be controlled. Stretching and yoga doesn't apply any physical force to your back so I don't see how that's relevant. And massaging can be controlled by another person by applying a force in VARIOUS directions at a much lighter degree. Foam rolling causes the spine to bend in a direction it is not supposed to bend. Not to mention the amount of nerve bundles in the spine that can be damaged.
Need me to go further? Should I draw a free body diagram with the simple mechanics involved? This is simple PHYSICS. Not nonsense. But your arguments consist of using extreme examples to make the people in this thread look stupid.
Let's look back at the hydrostability statement I posted last week. You said that made no sense? You do realize that cars consists of anti locking braking systems? That defend against slipping and provide stability in wet conditions. Otherwise known as hydrostability? You want to know the SCIENCE behind this. Different fluids and materials have different coefficients of friction. Then there's kinetic and static friction. Look at at the force vs position graphs for an object to get it from stationary to moving. That's where kinetic and static friction come in. And those opposing forces are ultimately the reason behind ABS that try and provide hydrostability, the thing you said didn't make sense.
Do I need to go on and on about how much non-sense I'm throwing around?
You're a smart dude. We get it. I like the information you provide. You just don't have to try and make people feel stupid every time you post. It cultivates an environment in which people are afraid to ask questions that they genuinely don't know the answer to. As knowledgeable as you are, you lack the ability to realize that a majority of the people in this thread don't know as much about this stuff as you do. Just tone it down a little man.