- 16,006
- 4,734
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2012
Upsets happen in one game tournaments ..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Lost to a lower seed in 2006 man and, technically lost to a lower seed in 2012.our down years post 2009 are because of the sanctionsHey man, you're the one that said Duke is constantly underachieving. I just went back and looked since K has been there.
I mean I guess I can agree with 2015, but it's silly to dis-credit a team for winning the whole damn thing.
2010 I think they overachieved. PS #9, Lost 3 of 7 at one point in the season...
2007, they were a 6 seed. There weren't high expectations there. Therefore, they didn't really underperform.
Also, quit it with this whole UNC has never "blundered" in the tournament. 2006? Plus, you can't just dismiss NIT appearances or down-years for UNC (2013 and 2014)
Also, with Kentucky. Title favorite in 2004, lost to UAB. Down years from 2006-2009 and 2013.
even when we weren't that good we never lost to a lower seed
we have one NIT appearance vs MULTIPLE bad tourney losses for Duke. it isn't even comparable
"constantly" underachieves. Okay. Take off your carolina blue glasses man, it's okay to say another blue blood program is really good.in 2012 we lost because we had a walk-on starting at pg
I'll give you 06 but even then george mason went to the final four.
and duke constantly underachieves is my point and you proved it.
Is UCLA still considered a blue blood?
since winning in 2010 they have underperformed in the tournament 4/7 times"constantly" underachieves. Okay. Take off your carolina blue glasses man, it's okay to say another blue blood program is really good.
Is UCLA still considered a blue blood?
Yes.
underrated programWord.
I feel UCONN should be considered a blue blood. 4 championships in the past 20 years. more than anyone else.
idk why y'all are bringing up stuff from decades ago when I stated since the 1&D eraSee, I had a good laugh at Duke last night but why ya gonna make me defend them this afternoon?
Since when is 5 titles since 1991 an underachievement? In what world Sway???
Is UCLA still considered a blue blood?
Yes.
Word.
I feel UCONN should be considered a blue blood. 4 championships in the past 20 years. more than anyone else.
I hear you, but you can't just pick and choose certain eras and jump to conclusions from there. (Not to mention you're picking an era where Duke has two NCs)idk why y'all are bringing up stuff from decades ago when I stated since the 1&D eraSee, I had a good laugh at Duke last night but why ya gonna make me defend them this afternoon?
Since when is 5 titles since 1991 an underachievement? In what world Sway???
missing the point entirely
idk why y'all are bringing up stuff from decades ago when I stated since the 1&D eraSee, I had a good laugh at Duke last night but why ya gonna make me defend them this afternoon?
Since when is 5 titles since 1991 an underachievement? In what world Sway???
missing the point entirely
of course but when did I ever say UNC has been better? don't know why y'all keep bringing them upThe early tournament knockouts and underachieving has started in this decade, right?
In a decade where they have two natty's.
I know you can't act like you wouldn't trade UNC's 2010 to current resume for duke's. early exits and all.
They have 2 rings to our 0.
Duke is one of the best basketball programs of all time but they for some reason have been underperforming in recent seasons and that's a fact
idk why y'all are bringing up stuff from decades ago when I stated since the 1&D eraSee, I had a good laugh at Duke last night but why ya gonna make me defend them this afternoon?
Since when is 5 titles since 1991 an underachievement? In what world Sway???
missing the point entirely
dawg I ain't repeating myself no moreAre you serious? They just won a title in 2015